Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From	Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random
Date	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:09:21 +0000
Lines	20
Message-ID	<mailman.34.1450717787.2237.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<56776b9d$0$1615$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <oYVdy.22469$Hz3.17030@fx43.iad> <CALwzidkeVY7+061uNf-OkaVTZWQiwNMZgTNw_=YrFB2u7wjeOA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	news.uni-berlin.de EcUjL7dWtUMIJSng3TVz4AzNqHoHS3TFn/YEUF0JSikg==
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'url:pypi': 0.03; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'source.': 0.05; '21,': 0.07; 'trailing': 0.07; 'finite': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:into': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'subject:random': 0.16; 'subject:versus': 0.16; 'underscores': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.19; '2015': 0.20; 'machine': 0.21; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'dec': 0.23; 'replacing': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.26; 'point.': 0.27; 'transition': 0.27; 'separated': 0.29; "i'd": 0.31; 'language.': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.33; 'text': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'expect': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'seem': 0.37; 'starting': 0.37; 'mean': 0.38; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'url:0': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'score': 0.76; 'smith': 0.76; 'sounds': 0.76; 'matrix.': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	host-92-21-245-167.as13285.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
In-Reply-To	<CALwzidkeVY7+061uNf-OkaVTZWQiwNMZgTNw_=YrFB2u7wjeOA@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.20+
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:100680

Show key headers only | View raw

On 21/12/2015 16:49, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:40 AM, duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> Finite state machine / transition matrix. Learn from some English text
>> source. Then process your strings by lower casing, replacing underscores
>> with spaces, removing trailing numeric characters etc. Base your score
>> on something like the mean transition probability. I'd expect to see two
>> pretty well separated groups of scores.
>
> Sounds like a case for a Hidden Markov Model.
>

In which case https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Markov/0.1 would seem to be a 
starting point.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Thread

Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 14:01 +1100
  Categorising strings on meaningful–meaningless spectrum (was: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-12-21 14:45 +1100
    Re: Categorising strings on meaningful–meaningless spectrum (was: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 19:47 +1100
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 15:22 +1100
    Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 19:57 +1100
    Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 17:45 -0800
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-12-21 09:24 +0100
    Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-12-21 10:56 +0100
      Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 21:36 +1100
        Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-12-21 11:53 +0100
          Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-12-21 11:56 +0100
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 14:25 +0100
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net> - 2015-12-21 07:51 -0600
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-21 16:40 +0000
    Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 09:49 -0700
      Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-21 17:41 +0000
    Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-12-21 17:09 +0000
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-12-21 09:20 -0800

csiph-web