Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #42628
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <janpeterr@freenet.de> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.051 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'arguments': 0.09; 'caller': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'suggest': 0.14; 'attributes,': 0.16; 'attributes.': 0.16; 'metaclass': 0.16; 'subject:their': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'all,': 0.19; 'passing': 0.19; 'solution.': 0.20; 'work,': 0.20; 'seems': 0.21; 'creating': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "i've": 0.25; 'this:': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'bunch': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'problem': 0.35; 'classes': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'add': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'explains': 0.36; 'instances': 0.36; 'returning': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'hi,': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'such': 0.63; 'different': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'header :Reply-To:1': 0.67; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.71; 'decorate': 0.84; 'url:video': 0.84; 'received:89': 0.85; 'demand': 0.91 |
| Date | Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:06:11 +0300 |
| From | Jan Riechers <janpeterr@freenet.de> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: Decorating functions without losing their signatures |
| References | <kjfv4f$4g1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In-Reply-To | <kjfv4f$4g1$1@dont-email.me> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| Reply-To | janpeterr@freenet.de |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.34.1364966074.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 26 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1364966074 news.xs4all.nl 6904 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52738 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:42628 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 03.04.2013 04:05, Rotwang wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's a Python problem I've come up against and my crappy solution. > Hopefully someone here can suggest something better. I want to decorate > a bunch of functions with different signatures; for example, I might > want to add some keyword-only arguments to all functions that return > instances of a particular class so that the caller can create instances > with additional attributes. So I do something like this: [...] > It seems to work, but I don't like it. Does anyone know of a better way > of doing the same thing? Hi, I think you might want to check out that Pycon2013 Video about Metaclass Prgoramming of David Beazley: http://www.pyvideo.org/video/1716/python-3-metaprogramming He explains how to passing attributes, such creating custom classes on demand and returning there signatures even when wrapped. I think that was what you wanted to archive? Regards Jan
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Decorating functions without losing their signatures Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-04-03 02:05 +0100
Re: Decorating functions without losing their signatures Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-03 04:15 +0000
Re: Decorating functions without losing their signatures Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-04-04 02:53 +0100
Re: Decorating functions without losing their signatures Jan Riechers <janpeterr@freenet.de> - 2013-04-03 08:06 +0300
Re: Decorating functions without losing their signatures Michele Simionato <michele.simionato@gmail.com> - 2013-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Decorating functions without losing their signatures Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-04-04 03:17 +0100
Re: Decorating functions without losing their signatures Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-04-04 02:44 +0100
csiph-web