Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #60712
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.003 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'modify': 0.07; 'removes': 0.07; 'suppose': 0.07; 'iterate': 0.09; 'pointless': 0.09; 'subject:while': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; '10:49': 0.16; 'collections': 0.16; 'complicated,': 0.16; 'element,': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'iterables': 0.16; 'iteration': 0.16; 'iteration.': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'loops': 0.16; 'message- id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'objects.': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'two.': 0.16; 'elements': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'written': 0.21; 'example': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'entries': 0.24; 'references': 0.26; 'code:': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'list:': 0.30; 'statement': 0.30; 'implicit': 0.31; 'modified,': 0.31; 'are:': 0.33; 'not.': 0.33; 'copying': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'advice': 0.35; 'received:84': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'acceptable': 0.36; 'list': 0.37; 'clear': 0.37; 'performance': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'list,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'though,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'prices': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'length': 0.61; 'new': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'header:Reply- To:1': 0.67; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.71; 'subject:For': 0.78; 'batchelder': 0.84; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.84; 'careful': 0.91 |
| X-CM-Score | 0.00 |
| X-CNFS-Analysis | v=2.1 cv=IvYnLtPg c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=OJn0C7AadrgA:10 a=MFmyrltG3qAA:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=OUOv7kDek9cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=lXo6rH948BwA:10 a=l4FM98rAXYkYyrUNPJ4A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 |
| X-AUTH | mrabarnett:2500 |
| Date | Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:25:05 +0000 |
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: For-each behavior while modifying a collection |
| References | <CAO5g_efLUD9kJ_W+fBUWv=9yrDggN2560H5Fx3uUVDQ=oAVREg@mail.gmail.com> <l77u09$30r$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| In-Reply-To | <l77u09$30r$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| Reply-To | python-list@python.org |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3366.1385659495.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 51 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1385659495 news.xs4all.nl 16001 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37973 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:60712 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 28/11/2013 17:20, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 11/28/13 10:49 AM, Valentin Zahnd wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> For-each does not iterate ober all entries of collection, if one
>> removes elements during the iteration.
>>
>> Example code:
>>
>> def keepByValue(self, key=None, value=[]):
>> for row in self.flows:
>> if not row[key] in value:
>> self.flows.remove(row)
>>
>> It is clear why it behaves on that way. Every time one removes an
>> element, the length of the colleciton decreases by one while the
>> counter of the for each statement is not.
>> The questions are:
>> 1. Why does the interprete not uses a copy of the collection to
>> iterate over it? Are there performance reasons?
>
> Because implicit copying would be pointless in most cases. Most loops
> don't even want to modify the collection, why copy all iterables just in
> case your loop might be one of the tiny few that might change the
> collection?
>
> Of course, if that prices is acceptable to you, you could do the copy
> yourself:
>
> for row in list(self.flows):
> if row[key] not in value:
> self.flows.remove(row)
>
>> 2. Why is the counter for the iteration not modified?
>
> Because the list and the iterator over the list are different objects.
> I suppose the list and the iterator could have been written to update
> when the list is modified, but it could get pretty complicated, even
> more so if you want to do the same for other collections like dictionaries.
>
> The best advice is: don't modify the list, instead make a new list:
>
> self.flows = [r for r in self.flows if r[key] not in value]
>
> Be careful though, since there might be other references to the list,
> and now you have two.
>
The simple solution in that case is:
self.flows[:] = [r for r in self.flows if r[key] not in value]
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: For-each behavior while modifying a collection MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-11-28 17:25 +0000
csiph-web