Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #48272
| From | Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Don't feed the troll... |
| Date | 2013-06-15 10:30 +0100 |
| References | <7wfvwkcihf.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <20130615020957.GA72426@cskk.homeip.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3366.1371288673.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2013-06-15 03:09, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 15Jun2013 10:42, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > | "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> writes: > | Even for those who do participate by email, though, your approach is > | broken: > | > My answer is simple. Get a proper email system that filters out > | > duplicates. > | > | The message sent to the individual typically arrives earlier (since it > | is sent straight from you to the individual), and the message on the > | forum arrives later (since it typically requires more processing). > | > | But since we're participating in the discussion on the forum and not in > | individual email, it is the later one we want, and the earlier one > | should be deleted. > > They're the same message! (Delivered twice.) Replying to either is equivalent. > So broadly I don't care which gets deleted; it works regardless. > > | So at the point the first message arrives, it isn't a duplicate. The > | mail program will show it anyway, because “remove duplicates” can't > | catch it when there's no duplicate yet. > > But it can when the second one arrives. This is true regardless of > the delivery order. Ben said that he doesn't use email for this list. Neither do I. We use one of the newsgroup mirrors. If you Cc us, we will get a reply on the newsgroup (where we want it) and a reply in our email (where we don't). The two systems cannot talk to each other to delete the other message. > | You do this by using your mail client's “reply to list” function, which > | uses the RFC 3696 information in every mailing list message. > > No need, but a valid option. > > | Is there any mail client which doesn't have this function? If so, use > | your vendor's bug reporting system to request this feature as standard, > | and/or switch to a better mail client until they fix that. > > Sorry, I could have sworn you said you weren't using a mail client for this... He's suggesting that *you* who are using a mail reader to use the "reply to list" functionality or request it if it is not present. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Don't feed the troll... Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-06-15 10:30 +0100
csiph-web