Re: cgi parse_qs still exists?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; '"this': 0.03; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'base.': 0.05; 'deprecated': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:still': 0.09; 'thus,': 0.09; 'language.': 0.14; 'backward': 0.16; 'deprecation': 0.16; 'design?': 0.16; 'happily': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'sad': 0.16; 'subject:exists': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'library': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'instead.': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'raise': 0.29; 'went': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'helpful.': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'url:python': 0.33; 'skip:u 20': 0.35; 'anybody': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; '2.6': 0.36; 'maintained': 0.36; 'module.': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'somebody': 0.38; 'url:library': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'url:3': 0.61; 'our': 0.64; 'provide': 0.64; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'alternative.': 0.84; 'beats': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject	Re: cgi parse_qs still exists?
Date	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:52:07 +0100
References	<mf9quc$v7o$3@ger.gmane.org> <87wq1z3rri.fsf@handshake.de>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	host-78-146-14-164.as13285.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
In-Reply-To	<87wq1z3rri.fsf@handshake.de>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.19
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.336.1427701943.10327.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	24
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1427701943 news.xs4all.nl 2963 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50779
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:88322

Show key headers only | View raw

On 30/03/2015 07:48, dieter wrote:
> Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
>
>> This has been marked for deprecation since at least 2.6 but is still
>> in the 3.5 code base.  Does anybody know if this is by accident or
>> design? If the former I'll happily raise an issue to get it removed
>> unless somebody beats me to it.
>
> I am using "cgi.parse_qs" - and I find it very helpful.
>
> Thus, I would be sad if it went away -- unless the library would
> provide an alternative.
>

 From https://docs.python.org/3/library/cgi.html "This function is 
deprecated in this module. Use urllib.parse.parse_qs() instead. It is 
maintained here only for backward compatibility."

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: cgi parse_qs still exists? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-30 08:52 +0100

csiph-web