Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #60664
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'warnings': 0.04; 'explicitly': 0.05; 'output': 0.05; 'sufficient': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; '"""': 0.07; '"as': 0.07; 'context': 0.07; 'fixes': 0.07; 'lines,': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'input,': 0.09; 'permissions': 0.09; 'quotes:': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'statements': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'anyway': 0.14; 'mostly': 0.14; 'comments:': 0.16; 'docstrings': 0.16; 'exist."""': 0.16; 'guessing': 0.16; 'newlines': 0.16; 'parentheses': 0.16; 'pep8': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'recognised': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:breaking': 0.16; 'syntax,': 0.16; 'thoughts?': 0.16; 'url.': 0.16; 'wraps': 0.16; 'ignore': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; 'trying': 0.19; "python's": 0.19; 'split': 0.19; 'meant': 0.20; 'fit': 0.20; 'work,': 0.20; 'code,': 0.22; 'input': 0.22; 'example': 0.22; 'separate': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'error': 0.23; 'convenient': 0.24; 'documented': 0.24; 'file.': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'possibly': 0.26; 'second': 0.26; 'least': 0.26; '(for': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'feature': 0.29; 'wonder': 0.29; 'especially': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'getting': 0.31; 'lines': 0.31; 'page.': 0.31; 'breaking': 0.31; 'comments,': 0.31; 'ok.': 0.31; 'quotes': 0.31; 'though.': 0.31; 'way?': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'open': 0.33; 'says': 0.33; 'running': 0.33; 'third': 0.33; 'comment': 0.34; 'noticed': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'problem.': 0.35; 'skip:s 30': 0.35; 'case,': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'marks': 0.36; 'ones,': 0.36; 'right?': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'handle': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'blank': 0.60; 'free': 0.61; 'received:173': 0.61; 'further': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'such': 0.63; 'become': 0.64; 'between': 0.67; 'believe': 0.68; 'ending': 0.78; 'introduce': 0.78; 'potentially': 0.81; 'disappear': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'subject:long': 0.84; 'victor': 0.84; 'warning.': 0.84; 'messages:': 0.91; 'urls,': 0.91 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
| Subject | Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? |
| Date | Wed, 27 Nov 2013 21:55:08 -0500 |
| References | <a98cfbef-bc48-41e8-98de-e616f201ffbe@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | pool-173-75-254-207.phlapa.fios.verizon.net |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <a98cfbef-bc48-41e8-98de-e616f201ffbe@googlegroups.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3339.1385607330.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 118 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1385607330 news.xs4all.nl 15959 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48848 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:60664 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 11/27/2013 8:57 PM, Victor Hooi wrote:
[sorry if the re-wrapping mis-formats anything]
> I'm running pep8
Ah yes, the module that turns PEP8 into the straightjacket it explicitly
says it is not meant to be.
> across my code,
We mostly to not change existing stdlib modules to conform unless they
are being edited anyway for fixes and features.
> and getting warnings about my long lines (> 80 characters).
You are free to ignore such
> I'm wonder what's the recommended way to handle the below cases, and
> fit under 80 characters.
>
> First example - multiple context handlers:
>
> with open(self.full_path, 'r') as input, open(self.output_csv, 'ab')
> as output:
>
> and in my case, with indents, the 80-character marks is just before
> the ending "as output".
>
> What's the standard recognised way to split this across multiple
> lines, so that I'm under 80 characters?
I believe () does not work, so put \ after 'input,'.
> I can't just split after the "as input," as that isn't valid syntax,
> and there's no convenient parentheses for me to split over.
>
> Is there a standard Pythonic way?
>
> Second example - long error messages:
>
> self.logger.error('Unable to open input or output file - %s. Please
> check you have sufficient permissions and the file and parent
> directory exist.' % e)
>
> I can use triple quotes:
>
> self.logger.error( """Unable to open input or output file - %s.
> Please check you have sufficient permissions and the file and parent
> directory exist.""" % e)
>
> However, that will introduce newlines in the message, which I don't
> want.
>
> I can use backslashes:
>
> self.logger.error( 'Unable to open input or output file - %s. Please
> check you\ have sufficient permissions and the file and parent
> directory\ exist.' % e)
>
> which won't introduce newlines.
>
> Or I can put them all as separate strings, and trust Python to glue
> them together:
Such gluing in a documented feature and I think you can trust it to not
disappear (for at least a decade ;-).
> self.logger.error( 'Unable to open input or output file - %s. Please
> check you' 'have sufficient permissions and the file and parent
> directory' 'exist.' % e)
>
> Which way is the recommended Pythonic way?
>
> Third example - long comments:
>
> """ NB - We can't use Psycopg2's parametised statements here, as that
> automatically wraps everything in single quotes. So
> s3://my_bucket/my_file.csv.gz would become
> s3://'my_bucket'/'my_file.csv.gz'. Hence, we use Python's normal
> string formating - this could potentially exposes us to SQL injection
> attacks via the config.yaml file. I'm not aware of any easy ways
> around this currently though - I'm open to suggestions though. See
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9354392/psycopg2-cursor-execute-with-sql-query-parameter-causes-syntax-error
>
>for further information. """
>
> In this case, I'm guessing a using triple quotes (""") is a better
> idea with multi-line comments, right?
Either are ok.
> However, I've noticed that I can't seem to put in line-breaks inside
> the comment without triggering a warning. For example, trying to put
> in another empty line in between lines 6 and 7 above causes a
> warning.
Blank lines are normal in triple-quoted strings and recommended for
docstrings longer than a line. So I am puzzled as to your problem.
> Also, how would I split up the long URLs?
Don't if you can possibly avoid it.
> Breaking it up makes it annoying to use the URL.
Yep.
> Thoughts?
Some urls, especially long ones, have extra tracking/query junk that can
be removed while still pointing to the page.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Victor Hooi <victorhooi@gmail.com> - 2013-11-27 17:57 -0800
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Victor Hooi <victorhooi@gmail.com> - 2013-11-27 18:03 -0800
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-11-28 13:55 +1100
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-11-27 22:03 -0500
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-11-27 22:05 -0500
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-11-28 08:12 +0200
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-28 17:22 +1100
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-11-28 10:08 -0500
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-11-28 13:47 +1100
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-28 03:02 +0000
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-11-28 14:14 +1100
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-11-27 21:55 -0500
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-11-27 21:59 -0500
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-28 03:58 +0000
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-11-28 08:04 -0600
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-29 01:21 +1100
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-11-28 12:26 -0500
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-11-28 14:06 +1100
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Neil Cerutti <mr.cerutti@gmail.com> - 2013-11-27 22:09 -0500
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-11-27 19:15 -0800
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-28 03:57 +0000
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-28 04:03 +0000
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-11-28 12:43 +0000
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2013-11-28 17:38 +0000
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Roel Schroeven <roel@roelschroeven.net> - 2013-11-28 19:37 +0100
Re: Python and PEP8 - Recommendations on breaking up long lines? Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2013-12-04 17:47 -0800
csiph-web