Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #52146

Is a Metaclass the appropriate way to solve this problem?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <mclefavor@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.011
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'syntax': 0.04; 'json': 0.07; 'problem?': 0.07; 'attributes': 0.09; "django's": 0.09; 'high-profile': 0.09; 'iterate': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; '"key"': 0.16; 'class)': 0.16; 'descriptor.': 0.16; 'inheritance': 0.16; 'metaclass': 0.16; 'metaclasses': 0.16; 'metaclasses.': 0.16; 'objects.': 0.16; 'timestamp': 0.16; 'trying': 0.19; 'user.': 0.19; '8bit%:5': 0.22; 'all:': 0.24; 'certainly': 0.24; 'subject:problem': 0.24; 'people,': 0.24; 'question': 0.24; 'define': 0.26; 'defined': 0.27; 'tim': 0.29; 'topic': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; '8bit%:3': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '(which': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'description,': 0.31; 'table,': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'interface': 0.32; 'skip:_ 10': 0.34; 'skip:d 20': 0.34; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'advice': 0.35; 'common': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'convert': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; '(e.g.,': 0.36; 'representing': 0.36; 'entry': 0.36; 'method': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'detail': 0.37; 'expected': 0.38; 'represent': 0.38; 'skip:& 10': 0.38; 'thank': 0.38; 'problems': 0.38; 'solving': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; '\xa0\xa0\xa0': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'company': 0.60; 'solve': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'situation': 0.65; 'series': 0.66; 'gain': 0.79; 'subject:this': 0.83; 'all!': 0.84; 'bells': 0.84; 'database*': 0.84; 'fields,': 0.84; 'ultimate': 0.93; 'tags,': 0.95
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=x53BawrjJw+SudJrc9f4AiZRAhkIuOhr801E/FqO2L4=; b=tgoluwqvG7+nmYLVEctU6KkQfSvXk2KbCS10xOdflqPZglk//qqGBG5O4ziJaFdJ8P t5tbxeT8/tYVjJWuj1ml4rlubNdcC1vWfidXh1+k+2pSUX5XIoAx3ZG6KUKcgtX5ZtIV 9m+yPwfbPh7YYSjvmsMownwaa96Hwst28L7khGtcZr5bSq4XekJ9Ub+Z2+7p2JkXoG8m RZrikjdlH050ZuDz8U+udFwYMGAR5aS5bKPu4H4IXG/l8HE7X91ejvRWvkd9xP3x1ExG U4hRMhljoiGrXtjMsxWvLaQQ0Bsq7gRabHSc09XdG7cxuCyhAavpB1mn8PWJmgs+cNKv d0iA==
X-Received by 10.42.228.68 with SMTP id jd4mr495163icb.44.1375904369155; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 12:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
From Matthew Lefavor <mclefavor@gmail.com>
Date Wed, 7 Aug 2013 15:38:48 -0400
Subject Is a Metaclass the appropriate way to solve this problem?
To Python Mailing List <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3a3042b243404e360b382
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.326.1375904372.1251.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 101
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1375904372 news.xs4all.nl 15882 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60419
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:52146

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

All:

Like most people, I find the whole metaclass topic pretty obscure, and I
have avoided trying to use one for a while. I am also aware of Tim Peter's
famous advice that if you have to ask whether you need a metaclass, then
you almost certainly don't. But in this case I know I am solving a problem
similar to problems that other high-profile Python modules (e.g., Django's
Model class) have solved using metaclasses.

My company is using a database whose interface is defined in a series of
JSON objects. I am writing some interface code to the database and I am
trying to hide the detail of the JSON implementation from the user.

I want the user to be able to define a class representing a database entry
for any arbitrary table, whose attributes represent database entities, like
fields or tags, with syntax something like the following:

class DataSet:
    data_set_id = DatabaseKeyField(int)
    description = DatabaseField(str)
    creation_date = DatabaseField(datetime.date)
    creation_timestamp = DatabaseField(datetime.datetime)

    def __init__(self, ds_id, description, timestamp):
        self.data_set_id = ds_id
        self.description = description
        self.creation_timestamp = timestamp
        self.creation_date = timestamp.date

I know that to create the DatabaseField objects I should be using a
descriptor. But I also want the DataSet to automatically gain methods that
will convert it into the expected JSON syntax (e.g., a __specifier__ method
that will create a JSON object with only "key" fields, and an __object__
method that will create a JSON object with all the fields and other bells
and whistles.)

My ultimate question then: How do I go about adding those kinds of methods
(which iterate through all the attributes which are Database* descriptors)?
I know that I could eschew metaclasses altogether and use a common
super-class, but this doesn't feel like the right situation for inheritance
to me. Is a metaclass going to be the cleanest and easiest-to-understand
way to solve this problem?

Thank you, all!

-MCL

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is a Metaclass the appropriate way to solve this problem? Matthew Lefavor <mclefavor@gmail.com> - 2013-08-07 15:38 -0400

csiph-web