Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #105206
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!testfeeder.ecngs.de!81.171.118.61.MISMATCH!peer01.fr7!news.highwinds-media.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: How to waste computer memory? |
| Date | Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:37:21 +1100 |
| Lines | 82 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.314.1458304644.12893.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <a2639027-c69c-46df-a7a5-45a677b9e01d@googlegroups.com> <265377f4-741d-4aa2-9338-239f56f8bc57@googlegroups.com> <mailman.302.1458284448.12893.python-list@python.org> <56ebea83$0$1599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de ogvdQS1S+zMDgkvo3hhjWgvIRWCWh6C9KVlaraCRtfFg== |
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'received:209.85.223': 0.03; 'position,': 0.04; 'imply': 0.07; 'indexing': 0.07; 'utf-8': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'subject:How': 0.09; 'bytes,': 0.09; 'ignoring': 0.09; 'indexes': 0.09; 'non-ascii': 0.09; 'okay': 0.09; 'sake': 0.09; 'themselves,': 0.09; 'transcoding': 0.09; 'unicode,': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'assume': 0.11; 'language,': 0.11; 'index': 0.13; 'encoding': 0.15; 'thu,': 0.15; '(assuming': 0.16; '*you*': 0.16; '2016': 0.16; '255': 0.16; 'cheap.': 0.16; 'disk.': 0.16; 'exclusion': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'locating': 0.16; 'operation.': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'sequential': 0.16; 'string:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'memory': 0.17; 'string': 0.17; 'byte': 0.18; 'bytes': 0.18; 'first.': 0.18; 'have:': 0.18; 'instance,': 0.18; 'string,': 0.18; '(in': 0.18; 'python?': 0.18; 'thanks.': 0.18; 'language': 0.19; '>>>': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'fairly': 0.22; 'text,': 0.22; 'trying': 0.22; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; "doesn't": 0.26; 'point.': 0.27; 'points': 0.27; 'fri,': 0.27; 'handling': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'grouping': 0.29; 'table,': 0.29; 'array': 0.29; 'character': 0.29; 'asked': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; '(including': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'becomes': 0.30; 'normally': 0.30; 'position.': 0.30; 'waste': 0.30; 'point': 0.33; 'consist': 0.33; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'limitations': 0.33; 'point,': 0.33; 'purposes,': 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'stream': 0.33; '(for': 0.34; 'definition': 0.34; 'languages': 0.34; 'handle': 0.34; 'skip:d 20': 0.34; 'add': 0.34; 'list': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'could': 0.35; '8bit%:86': 0.35; 'skip:e 40': 0.35; 'unicode': 0.35; 'level': 0.35; "isn't": 0.35; 'supports': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'instead': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'johnson': 0.37; 'release': 0.37; 'starting': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'format': 0.39; 'still': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'high': 0.60; 'your': 0.60; 'provide': 0.61; 'total': 0.62; '(that': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'necessarily': 0.63; 'complete': 0.63; 'goal': 0.64; 'mar': 0.65; 'series': 0.65; 'else.': 0.66; 'rare': 0.66; 'store,': 0.66; 'worth': 0.67; 'characters.)': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'gig': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91; 'rick': 0.93; 'ultimate': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=affic8QqFT6NmSiSD2IbshhfZmZxyroWH+elnhxprns=; b=dsdOVQ/411/az3YvRhuhnlJsHm3Vg+YLXLZu9yVcB78V4rNspaC+eqUd3mRRsXZOnP ETCWOKSowBNFjHe+xlGdeQFKmHFn7Hk17rn7LJH5ki53A3kg0T5M+NABe1yod+P/gvxX gyUKaanIqNdnTUj68NoZAZg7geExSDRjaXiZm5do4Bjl3wA1/XBS+bh1ykBfRX+LZUKn Qc0nVGzI1/NeyM2YcwYuOFzMz9rYZvH1imEKoaC5cf4Jj2qNMtCRasIjMojB9SEKP3Uk X9XqIXyrovIRpQmfQ97qqmthHHbt7YBeG8jJGnxdBDJaGU/HIQx99iGFVKFghEs9qACe p0hw== |
| X-Google-DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=affic8QqFT6NmSiSD2IbshhfZmZxyroWH+elnhxprns=; b=W92Z1Pel6JU+9ISqQLKe9F9nUYoykzSjZFrXoEQBkge+4hfGkzu3dM3G7S29bzOiJ8 d5FIJIXzhpMC7ougCuRb+374iCZBPZbJo+n3wNw6u6seGnrT67wacKEFLv/c4kY12T5+ cCDmURYfLfhGL/onOVF1JRwClzjHc14rT3wmju+FizY8qLwkc+ZujO3mDdNip9Ttvj6F pxPs9W4dg0Z7e263tKUrlDigXVYdnHZUOQeG+jNJTJIQ9khsofL9WAg7NK0sID/vR6Ob ihQuCHwgbQ34Ihtxy7j9AQtALsXicUfDHLmYO/Lnnjy5w1Lu9iUanhDUkm/ORBuLmfqB rNeQ== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AD7BkJI7q5Ge6WR38yP96XhcYHW4zEdharn2GCCp7UJ6hHwIi4F8cFEbLX+mex8YQGXvYScr4E21EOgfiuIalA== |
| X-Received | by 10.107.128.104 with SMTP id b101mr15200754iod.31.1458304641761; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 05:37:21 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <56ebea83$0$1599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.21 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Received-Bytes | 9050 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 1897860954 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:105206 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 06:00 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Rick Johnson
>> <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> In the event that i change my mind about Unicode, and/or for
>>> the sake of others, who may want to know, please provide a
>>> list of languages that *YOU* think handle Unicode better than
>>> Python, starting with the best first. Thanks.
>
> Better than Python? Easy-peasy:
>
> List of languages with Unicode handling which is better than Python = []
>
> I'm not aware of any language with better or more complete Unicode
> functionality than Python's. (That doesn't necessarily mean that they don't
> exist.)
And this also doesn't preclude languages that have *as good* handling
as Python's, of which I know of one off-hand, and there may be any
number. (Trivial case: Take Python 3.5, change the definition of a
block to be { } instead of indentation, and release it as Bracethon
1.0. Voila, a distinct-yet-related language whose Unicode handling is
exactly as good as Python's.)
>> jmf has been asked this before, and as I recall he seems to feel that
>> UTF-8 should be used for all purposes, ignoring the limitations of
>> that encoding such as that indexing becomes a O(n) operation.
>
> Technically, UTF-8 doesn't *necessarily* imply indexing is O(n). For
> instance, your UTF-8 string might consist of an array of bytes containing
> the string, plus an array of indexes to the start of each code point. For
> example, the string:
>
> “abcπßЊ•𒀁”
>
> (including the quote marks) is 10 code points in length and 22 bytes as
> UTF-8. Grouping the (hex) bytes for each code point, we have:
>
> e2809c 61 62 63 cf80 c39f d08a e280a2 f0928081 e2809d
>
> so we could get a O(1) UTF-8 string by recording the bytes (in hex) plus the
> indexes (in decimal) in which each code point starts:
>
> e2809c616263cf80c39fd08ae280a2f0928081e2809d
>
> 0 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 15 19
>
> but (assuming each index needs 2 bytes, which supports strings up to 65535
> characters in length), that's actually LESS memory efficient than UTF-32:
> 42 bytes versus 40.
A lot of strings will have no more than 255 non-ASCII characters in
them. (For example, all strings which no more than 255 total
characters.) You could store, instead of the indexes themselves, a
series of one-byte offsets:
e2809c616263cf80c39fd08ae280a2f0928081e2809d
0 2 2 2 2 3 4 5 7 10
Locating a byte based on its character position is still O(1); you
look up that position in the offset table, add that to your original
character position, and you have the byte location. For strings with
too many non-ASCII codepoints, you'd need some other representation,
but at that point, it might be worth just switching to UTF-32.
Of course, O(1) isn't the ultimate goal to the exclusion of all else.
For a simple sequential parser, indexing might be such a rare
operation that it's okay for it to be O(N), as you're never going to
index more than a few characters from a known position. Or if you're
trying to search a few gig of text, it's entirely possible that
transcoding into an indexable format is a complete waste of time, and
it's better to just work with a stream of bytes straight off the disk.
But for a general string type in a high level language, I'm normally
going to assume that indexing is fairly cheap.
ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How to waste computer memory? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-03-17 07:34 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:21 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-17 20:31 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 07:42 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-17 21:08 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:13 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-17 14:30 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-17 22:32 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-17 22:42 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-17 23:11 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:17 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-17 21:26 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-17 22:38 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 10:02 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-03-17 21:37 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-03-17 21:43 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2016-03-17 20:51 -0400
Re: How to waste computer memory? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 18:47 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-18 10:44 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2016-03-18 10:11 -0400
Re: How to waste computer memory? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-19 13:50 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 01:00 -0600
Re: How to waste computer memory? Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-03-18 10:26 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-18 17:26 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-19 03:58 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-18 23:02 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-18 23:28 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 00:03 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 09:49 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 10:22 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 11:40 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-19 19:38 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-03-19 00:14 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-03-19 02:17 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-19 19:14 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 11:31 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-03-19 03:40 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 13:07 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-19 12:24 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 14:43 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-20 01:18 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-19 15:14 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-19 15:20 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-19 22:32 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 14:42 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-20 01:39 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 16:56 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-03-19 07:01 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-20 01:56 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 17:02 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-20 02:47 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-19 18:12 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-20 16:01 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 23:20 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-20 22:06 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 22:22 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-20 23:14 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 23:27 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-20 14:55 +0000
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-20 17:36 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-20 14:17 -0400
Re: How to waste computer memory? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-20 09:30 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-03-18 03:50 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-18 22:46 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-18 22:58 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-03-18 12:53 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 23:37 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 07:57 -0600
Re: How to waste computer memory? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-19 03:44 +1100
Re: How to waste computer memory? Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-03-18 20:22 +0200
Re: How to waste computer memory? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2016-03-18 13:03 -0700
Re: How to waste computer memory? sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2016-03-18 11:18 -0700
csiph-web