Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #32454
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'kind,': 0.05; 'bits': 0.07; 'bytes.': 0.07; 'item.': 0.07; 'nicely': 0.07; 'reason,': 0.07; 'type,': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'bytes,': 0.09; 'bytes;': 0.09; 'enum': 0.09; 'it;': 0.09; 'itself,': 0.09; "object's": 0.09; 'objects.': 0.09; 'pointers': 0.09; 'slices': 0.09; 'subject:()': 0.09; 'tracing': 0.09; 'tuple': 0.09; 'typedef': 0.09; 'itself.': 0.11; '24,': 0.16; 'count,': 0.16; 'count.': 0.16; 'elsewhere.': 0.16; 'expression,': 0.16; 'index;': 0.16; 'lower,': 0.16; 'merely': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'pointer,': 0.16; 'pointers,': 0.16; 'subject:array': 0.16; 'value;': 0.16; 'mon,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'bytes': 0.17; 'odd': 0.17; 'pieces': 0.17; 'pointer': 0.17; 'are:': 0.20; 'earlier': 0.21; 'object.': 0.22; 'struct': 0.22; 'tuples': 0.22; 'for?': 0.23; 'downloaded': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'fit': 0.26; 'skip:" 20': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'andrew': 0.27; 'start,': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'fixed': 0.28; 'actual': 0.28; 'pointer.': 0.29; 'objects': 0.29; 'included': 0.29; 'source': 0.29; 'knows': 0.30; 'notes': 0.30; 'figure': 0.30; 'expect': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'structure': 0.32; 'getting': 0.33; 'int': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'whatever': 0.35; 'data,': 0.35; 'so,': 0.35; 'expected': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'be.': 0.36; 'skip:{ 10': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'item': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'object': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'gives': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'step': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'back': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'note:': 0.64; 'contents.': 0.65; 'union': 0.66; 'contrary': 0.71; 'grow': 0.74; '24.': 0.84; 'elements:': 0.84; 'ref': 0.84; 'stop,': 0.84; 'step.': 0.91; 'imagine': 0.96 |
| X-Google-DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=nMMkfBwUgvo7of4epZH65QldANejntefijm5hXFGqac=; b=fJU2z6ZyVwJIXb6762XigjoHKs4WIottknMm1nRaoVGNoM+9DxDDupUUJ2JJ/u1urG NbEeBWQu+c3BMGDjBorXBU6ZeluWCmLx8aqfExQdcTRATiquvKcieezQHZFGAUCAfIPU addmBF3xXGYMP3N4yDjw/1sxZSbS87mLv4mc4u/a3velGYh+OGxB5DBAtTiOnMXDArNk JEHWK4OaexTVSTMyeVrd/wA0KQSALl2K00F/u42KNOr0l695mQtdeGwJQlwLhdUIs3J9 RmRzl3mZ2jwUjPGXt3hLr0T7LUrlIXvRH0g2GQyyirODcKq0+TrznKjldyRiirJtrswi v8SQ== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <508EC428.5080808@r3dsolutions.com> |
| References | <6998a955-7b34-4f4f-b8d6-62d1028f7561@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2986.1351482209.27098.python-list@python.org> <4c024364-84df-403b-8b9e-4a4c8f06121c@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2991.1351484760.27098.python-list@python.org> <cd108b9d-e951-463e-8e50-a5a024a27c7f@googlegroups.com> <508e6649$0$29967$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <508E1BC9.3000308@r3dsolutions.com> <CAPTjJmo3uK0Hfu4h78AkM6BPXXuU9sMuc74QeKFrW4jp54MGMg@mail.gmail.com> <508EC428.5080808@r3dsolutions.com> |
| From | Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> |
| Date | Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:49:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Negative array indicies and slice() |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Gm-Message-State | ALoCoQmRxH9UKKUZsfEaVuOsoGrp4jWPZ0X2mFgFi256/k83gtirrcyhauzHkhIq9ehSizOaD/8u |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3064.1351561789.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 93 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1351561789 news.xs4all.nl 6898 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33370 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:32454 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Andrew Robinson
<andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> wrote:
>
> Let's look at the source code rather than the web notes -- the source must
> be the true answer anyhow.
>
> I downloaded the source code for python 3.3.0, as the tbz;
> In the directory "Python-3.3.0/Python", look at Python-ast.c, line 2089 &
> ff.
>
> Clearly a slice is malloced for a slice_ty type.
> It has four elements: kind, lower, upper, and step.
>
> So, tracing it back to the struct definition...
>
> "Include/Python-ast.h" has "typedef struct _slice *slice_ty;"
>
> And, here's the answer!:
>
> enum _slice_kind {Slice_kind=1, ExtSlice_kind=2, Index_kind=3};
> struct _slice {
> enum _slice_kind kind;
> union {
> struct {
> expr_ty lower;
> expr_ty upper;
> expr_ty step;
> } Slice;
>
> struct {
> asdl_seq *dims;
> } ExtSlice;
>
> struct {
> expr_ty value;
> } Index;
>
> } v;
> };
>
>
> So, slice() does indeed have arbitrary python types included in it; contrary
> to what I read elsewhere.
> expr_ty is a pointer to an arbitrary expression, so the actual structure is
> 4 pointers, at 32 bits each = 16 bytes.
> The size of the structure itself, given in an earlier post, is 20 bytes --
> which means one more pointer is involved, perhaps the one pointing to the
> slice structure itself.
>
> Hmm...!
>
> An empty tuple gives sys.getsizeof( () ) = 24.
>
> But, I would expect a tuple to be merely a list of object pointers; hence I
> would expect 4 bytes for len(), and then a head pointer 4 bytes, and then a
> pointer for each object.
> 3 objects gives 12 bytes, + 8 = 16 bytes.
>
> Then we need one more pointer so Python knows where the struct is...
> So a Tuple of 3 objects ought to fit nicely into 20 bytes; the same size as
> slice() --
>
> but it's 24, even when empty...
> And 36 when initialized...
> What are the extra 16 bytes for?
Every Python object requires two pieces of data, both of which are
pointer-sized (one is a pointer, one is an int the size of a pointer).
These are: a pointer to the object's type, and the object's reference
count.
A tuple actually does not need a head pointer: the head pointer is
merely an offset from the tuple's pointer. It merely has a ref count,
type, an item count, and pointers to its contents.
A slice has the same type pointer and reference count, then three
pointers to the start, stop, and step objects. This means a slice
object should be the same size as a two-item tuple: the tuple needs a
count, while that is fixed at 3 for a slice (though some items may be
unset).
NOTE: The above is taken from reading the source code for Python 2.6.
For some odd reason, I am getting that an empty tuple consists of 6
pointer-sized objects (48 bytes on x64), rather than the expected 3
pointer-sized (24 bytes on x64). Slices are showing up as the expected
5 pointer-sized (40 bytes on x64), and tuples grow at the expected 1
pointer (8 bytes on x64) per item. I imagine I am missing something,
but cannot figure out what that would be.
>
> All I see is:
> typedef struct { object** whatever } PyTupleObject;
>
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-28 20:12 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 21:42 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-28 21:00 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 22:25 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew <andrewr3mail@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 00:54 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-10-29 01:18 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-29 11:19 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 22:32 +1100
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-28 21:52 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 23:40 +1100
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-29 22:02 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-28 23:01 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-10-29 09:52 -0400
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 08:20 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 17:01 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 00:04 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 16:54 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 02:15 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 00:53 +1100
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 11:09 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-29 22:14 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 08:42 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-30 00:02 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 12:34 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-30 08:17 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-30 08:47 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-30 23:48 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 23:29 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 23:53 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 17:04 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 09:55 +1100
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 17:07 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-10-29 19:24 -0400
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 17:43 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-10-29 20:17 -0400
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 18:05 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 11:00 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2012-10-29 18:49 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 15:39 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 23:55 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 00:51 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 17:17 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 01:21 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 01:32 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 02:46 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 12:02 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-30 07:21 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-30 21:33 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-31 10:07 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-31 16:01 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 15:47 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 15:55 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-31 09:00 +1100
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 16:02 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-30 23:30 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 11:27 -0600
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 16:33 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew <andrewr3mail@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 00:54 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-28 21:00 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew <andrewr3mail@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 21:09 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 21:44 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-29 01:24 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-10-29 01:37 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-29 01:59 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-29 09:36 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-29 10:34 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-29 01:59 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-28 22:14 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-29 01:08 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-10-29 01:26 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew <andrewr3mail@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 21:09 -0700
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-10-29 03:45 +0000
Re: Negative array indicies and slice() 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-11-01 18:08 -0700
csiph-web