Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #93510
| Date | 2015-07-05 15:37 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
| Subject | Re: (side-)effects and ... |
| References | <effects-20150705220525@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <20150705153625.263a3b21@bigbox.christie.dr> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.306.1436133359.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2015-07-05 15:36, Tim Chase wrote: > On 2015-07-05 20:29, Stefan Ram wrote: > > But why do we not have a common and well-known term for > > the counterpart, that something does not modify the state > > of the world, but that the state of the world does > > influence the value (behaviour) of a call such as > > »datetime.datetime.now().time()«? > > I believe the term is "idempotent" > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idempotent_function#Computer_science_meaning Though I've also heard the term "pure function" for a similar meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_function -tkc
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: (side-)effects and ... Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2015-07-05 15:37 -0500
csiph-web