Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #40819
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder2.hal-mli.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!cs.uu.nl!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.106 |
| X-Spam-Level | * |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.79; '*S*': 0.00; 'cursor': 0.09; 'underlying': 0.09; 'subject:optimization': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'stefan': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'all,': 0.21; 'thanks.': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'subject:list': 0.28; 'efficiently': 0.29; 'large.': 0.29; 'skip:_ 10': 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; 'query': 0.30; 'implement': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'that,': 0.34; "can't": 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'returning': 0.35; 'doing': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'anything': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'object': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'back': 0.62; 'skip:n 10': 0.63; 'limit': 0.65; 'manner': 0.74; '2013': 0.84; 'presumably': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=0Jcosl/VYGTzahmbqvNNzmKAU2Spl4hau4crW6pLkjo=; b=bxpfQaYIWSx7G56DzyvFDFlQDO/8Ajt8hqRgmkXhG6XA7jZfdxMFGMgLDPOlmzO2Iw A+E9Uffh6ugR38onUWuj8ewWmeuUDNbwnf2kTf5l7gvzKVHExuo7Gj+LQondaVPU0Ow8 Xb9Cn304TYg8PVsxNtdzR2LaQqk9TOJtOIFDF34bNXHx/Fmih/kjPyzEJYnTuaJtTDtP Cq7DOYxU80cMEHNYAFiOhUZUs8XG2FKbrHMDvrhfOGrKaHJXPj5jI8yxUl/gxcF6Tju9 hHZYZCL8pUvbqijWHbNYzj3Z/1t9us9KK1QnzZW/CEXNnjbjCgGQVbbICF4enmm0c1yY egIg== |
| X-Received | by 10.220.205.195 with SMTP id fr3mr13380807vcb.6.1362688060173; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:27:40 -0800 (PST) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <khap77$a95$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| References | <roy-572C99.22201106032013@70-1-84-166.pools.spcsdns.net> <20130306215735.649932ee@bigbox.christie.dr> <loom.20130307T121601-338@post.gmane.org> <CALwzid=wNNBa6Mnx0sr84N1+PiZHMHtra7iQHg_2pYDpsd4kig@mail.gmail.com> <khaep0$qst$1@ger.gmane.org> <CALwzidnpNK7w6gL8Pk1VqBdEFRXUuTdTyyPpOisNeMVpPLuWEg@mail.gmail.com> <khap77$a95$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:26:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Interesting list() un-optimization |
| To | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3051.1362688062.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 13 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1362688062 news.xs4all.nl 6921 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44509 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:40819 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> wrote: >> Didn't know about that, thanks. Presumably a proper iter(QuerySet()) >> object could implement __length_hint__ in an efficient manner rather >> than by just calling the __len__ of the underlying QuerySet, > > And how exactly would it do that, without either doing what __len__ does or > reading the whole result set into memory? If the underlying cursor provides its own efficient length hint, it could return that. Or if the query is result-limited, use the limit as a length hint, provided it's not absurdly large. And if you really can't efficiently determine anything about the length of the result set at all, you can always fall back on returning NotImplemented.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Interesting list() un-optimization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-06 22:20 -0500
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-03-06 22:38 -0500
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-03-06 21:57 -0600
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Kev Dwyer <kevin.p.dwyer@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 07:31 +0000
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2013-03-07 11:22 +0000
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 09:00 -0700
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2013-03-07 17:20 +0100
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 10:31 -0700
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-03-07 20:19 +0100
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 13:26 -0700
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-07 15:29 -0500
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-07 15:34 -0500
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2013-03-07 20:41 +0000
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-07 17:53 -0500
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-08 17:59 +0000
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-08 13:45 -0500
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-10 09:05 -0400
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-10 17:39 -0400
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-10 18:34 -0400
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-10 23:35 +0000
Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-10 19:50 -0400
csiph-web