Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #40748

Re: Interesting list() un-optimization

Show key headers only | View raw

Tim Chase <python.list <at> tim.thechases.com> writes:
 
> On 2013-03-06 22:20, Roy Smith wrote:
> > I stumbled upon an interesting bit of trivia concerning lists and
> > list comprehensions today.
> 
> A little testing
> shows that this can be rewritten as
> 
>   my_objects = list(iter(my_query_set))
> 
> which seems to then skip the costly __len__ call.  Performance geeks
> are welcome to time it against the list-comprehension version 
> 
> class Foo(object):
>     def __init__(self):
>         self.items = range(10)
>     def __iter__(self):
>         return iter(self.items)
>     def __len__(self):
>         print "Calling costly __len__"
>         return len(self.items)
> 

Well, it skips the costly len() call because your iter(Foo()) returns
iter(range()) under the hood and list() uses that object's __len__() method. In
most cases, such a workaround will not be feasible. Why should iter(QuerySet())
have a faster __len__() method defined than QuerySet() itself. Most likely,
iter(QuerySet()) just returns self anyway?
Best,
Wolfgang

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Interesting list() un-optimization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-06 22:20 -0500
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-03-06 22:38 -0500
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-03-06 21:57 -0600
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Kev Dwyer <kevin.p.dwyer@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 07:31 +0000
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2013-03-07 11:22 +0000
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 09:00 -0700
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2013-03-07 17:20 +0100
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 10:31 -0700
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-03-07 20:19 +0100
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 13:26 -0700
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-07 15:29 -0500
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-07 15:34 -0500
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2013-03-07 20:41 +0000
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-07 17:53 -0500
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-08 17:59 +0000
    Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-08 13:45 -0500
  Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-10 09:05 -0400
    Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-10 17:39 -0400
      Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-10 18:34 -0400
        Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-10 23:35 +0000
          Re: Interesting list() un-optimization Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-03-10 19:50 -0400

csiph-web