Re: zip list, variables

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.007
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.99; 'S': 0.00; 'sufficient': 0.05; 'nested': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'numpy': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'certainly': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'wondering': 0.29; 'subject:list': 0.30; 'lists': 0.32; 'moment': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'replies': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'list': 0.37; 'easily': 0.37; 'thank': 0.38; 'handle': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'more': 0.64; 'more?': 0.84; 'replies.': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Subject	Re: zip list, variables
Date	Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:58:54 +0100
Organization	None
References	<31cfb6e8-aa7e-46c2-ae0b-18d0d66e7bed@googlegroups.com> <qoteh6bwduh.fsf@ruuvi.it.helsinki.fi> <898792ac-2101-4b92-86e1-f4f9c986de28@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7Bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	p5084a6c3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
User-Agent	KNode/4.7.3
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.3004.1385024316.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	27
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1385024316 news.xs4all.nl 15926 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34407
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:60159

Show key headers only | View raw

flebber wrote:

> Thank you for the replies.
> 
> Looking at the replies I am wondering which solution is more scalable. At
> the moment it is only 2 nested lists but what about 5, 10, 20 or more?
> 
> Should I start looking into numpy to handle this or will list
> comprehension
>   >>> [ [ x + y for x, y in zip(x,y) ] for x, y in zip(a,b) ]
> Be sufficient ?

I would certainly prefer

>>> a + b
array([[ 6,  8],
       [10, 12]])

over the incomprehensible comprehension. But if it is the only usecase for 
numpy in your script and you are OK with its current performance, just put 
your listcomp into an aptly named function. Then you can write the easily 
understandable

c = matrix_add(a, b)

and avoid the numpy dependency.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

zip list, variables flebber <flebber.crue@gmail.com> - 2013-11-20 02:06 -0800
  Re: zip list, variables Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-20 11:38 +0100
  Re: zip list, variables Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-11-20 12:45 +0200
    Re: zip list, variables flebber <flebber.crue@gmail.com> - 2013-11-20 12:05 -0800
      Re: zip list, variables Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-21 01:03 +0000
      Re: zip list, variables Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-21 09:58 +0100

csiph-web