Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #111308

Re: What is precision of a number representation?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: What is precision of a number representation?
Date Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:57:16 +1000
Lines 27
Message-ID <mailman.3.1468288640.21009.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <834b1cce-38dd-474c-8915-4ff1cd6b27ec@googlegroups.com> <CALwzidmwcc0nTLtLBJm=JNAjOQNRe2umtmNXNAk=s+xoyxhU6Q@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.161.1468135349.2295.python-list@python.org> <7fcc8c21-106f-41d4-a5ba-409f3b54a56d@googlegroups.com> <CALwzidkiRh2+ttXewaQzyJhAKMjTb7AXYk=E2SxGyH_jw9o1gw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.180.1468249505.2295.python-list@python.org> <5783c91e$0$1622$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5783D63F.5040307@stoneleaf.us> <8560sbvqqd.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au> <CAPTjJmqL=1cxkCK+PAdTK7Cky95B_QoUNTZkgBxKDcJ9XGf+Bw@mail.gmail.com> <57841AE9.3090508@stoneleaf.us> <CAPTjJmq4vbB9aBd88uhgFoNDKs=6ps7Hnv1ns-k29jFHSRsGDw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de l9ZHz7DXbEuAlsT9GquvzwrywnTKMF8A5lu6CN35Bddg==
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.040
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'important,': 0.07; 'subject:number': 0.07; 'width': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'accuracy.': 0.09; 'sake': 0.09; '2016': 0.16; 'example)': 0.16; 'fit,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'measured': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'integer': 0.18; 'say,': 0.18; '(not': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'implicit': 0.22; 'precise': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'accuracy': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'figure': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'record': 0.29; '0.5': 0.29; 'measure': 0.29; 'tue,': 0.34; 'this?': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'could': 0.35; 'displays': 0.35; 'knowledge': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'display': 0.37; '12,': 0.37; 'one,': 0.37; 'mean': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'area': 0.39; 'your': 0.60; 'complete': 0.63; 'jul': 0.72; 'present.': 0.72; 'square': 0.76; 'low': 0.83; '(four': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'clearance': 0.84; 'fridge': 0.84; 'meters': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91; 'ethan': 0.91; 'furman': 0.91; 'laser': 0.93; 'hand,': 0.97
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=jyxAZUWi2DsoOXW1KY+BiC6+LdP/iAxahMHIFbdoKLg=; b=0yIyqWKddCWm+H+MHxmDeayCBmJB8F9PmG1+Co2Q8fh3BQK9B9soqq8vXcwMD2n6T6 qgp5DwH/IH9CYGJPbgiI/7WyaKKzN6pUG2xTc5CEZSMGbfGdiuSiCcEggsFaLNkJUnP2 R2dx3zyeK6bJVmR17SlZ1FW6OoVAd9iKxnBuUZP6tuFt75QouTcB3pbahs32iFkg293h NtZ6dJsxiBrW4jRwHtv6R6OoeuShDwWCV+tYcnbUKNuHsj8SOdN7raL9+XcFNDWWIPo3 LZZRVqMDfQRc0pVtKmPWIpEAwRfr0fsKqsThjrGxzGKHSt2dtp9xIi1I34xvIxnVPeQy r12w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=jyxAZUWi2DsoOXW1KY+BiC6+LdP/iAxahMHIFbdoKLg=; b=AJLRnbBE//09uXiBZiYBKOXhzBq36YeFfvezB4AlnCng6JIAeNNo/es6OxACsSO1Tf +bvYieOpODbDwT/k8UZNe3iLoivW3gFKcvcx+9IZRiVWFHLupBQ6V5cSMcHc2T4Tzj8y RLF4DIm7RfquCyDJC7shx6B6dGwlvKU7wOqGN2KcAojXI5tzWxhokmYLLiUM6b7PZ/6M 9cejyKB5g9oR8aHDASOz94yhPtqzUolLJNhjzah7VGOUwNiXwnj/Q3QqTAWQ1PpdL+39 T2O81MuvnTJtPFXolMb7llC9ikVL3sUfv0n57FJDKBOcuc5SPS0ZFhgCnhhz9365LC03 thVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State ALyK8tLVnq80kzG6hmFe3WPNxBiDwvhbFOtFzxgo1zgpwo0m7qiTnIx8W0GubmyuI9AOIC6Imi8zZfIp41Xrjg==
X-Received by 10.28.44.131 with SMTP id s125mr129430wms.61.1468288637498; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <57841AE9.3090508@stoneleaf.us>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <CAPTjJmq4vbB9aBd88uhgFoNDKs=6ps7Hnv1ns-k29jFHSRsGDw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <834b1cce-38dd-474c-8915-4ff1cd6b27ec@googlegroups.com> <CALwzidmwcc0nTLtLBJm=JNAjOQNRe2umtmNXNAk=s+xoyxhU6Q@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.161.1468135349.2295.python-list@python.org> <7fcc8c21-106f-41d4-a5ba-409f3b54a56d@googlegroups.com> <CALwzidkiRh2+ttXewaQzyJhAKMjTb7AXYk=E2SxGyH_jw9o1gw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.180.1468249505.2295.python-list@python.org> <5783c91e$0$1622$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5783D63F.5040307@stoneleaf.us> <8560sbvqqd.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au> <CAPTjJmqL=1cxkCK+PAdTK7Cky95B_QoUNTZkgBxKDcJ9XGf+Bw@mail.gmail.com> <57841AE9.3090508@stoneleaf.us>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:111308

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
>> This is why it's important to be able to record precisions of
>> arbitrary numbers. If I then measure the width of this corridor with a
>> laser, I could get an extremely precise answer - say, 2,147
>> millimeters, with a precision of four significant digits, and
>> excellent accuracy. But if I multiply those numbers together to
>> establish the floor area of the corridor, the result does NOT have
>> four significant figures. It would be 64 square meters (not 64.41),
>> and the accuracy would be pretty low (effectively, the *in*accuracies
>> of both measurements get combined). But on the other hand, if you want
>> to know whether your new fridge will fit, you could measure it with
>> the same laser and come up with a figure of 1,973 mm (four sig fig),
>> which would mean your clearance is 174mm (four sig fig). How do you
>> record this? Is it 174.0? 0174? "174 with four significant figures"?
>
>
> 174.0, because those last tenths of a millimeter could be very important,
> while knowledge that there are no thousands of millimeters is already
> present.
>

But I never measured it to tenths of a millimeter. The display on my
laser measurer (I don't actually have one, by the way, so all this is
complete fabrication for the sake of the example) displays integer
millimeters, with an implicit "+/- 0.5 mm".

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-09 22:54 -0700
  Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 01:21 -0600
    Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 17:34 -0700
      Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 09:04 -0600
        Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-12 02:28 +1000
          Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-07-11 10:24 -0700
            Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-12 11:47 +1200
              Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-07-11 17:24 -0700
              Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 19:16 -0600
          Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 12:38 -0600
            Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-12 13:38 +1000
              Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 00:21 -0600
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-13 09:57 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 00:05 -0700
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-13 18:49 +1000
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-13 16:01 +0200
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-13 20:04 -0400
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 15:24 -0700
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 18:45 -0600
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 20:39 -0700
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 23:18 -0600
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-14 17:47 +1000
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-14 07:34 -0400
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 08:30 -0600
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-14 19:02 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 11:10 -0600
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-14 20:30 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 18:17 -0600
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 18:08 -0700
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-15 09:06 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-15 09:54 +0200
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-07-15 11:40 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-15 20:56 +1000
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-15 13:44 +0200
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-07-15 16:38 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-15 16:47 +0200
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-07-15 16:13 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-16 01:12 +1000
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-15 09:39 -0400
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-15 16:32 +0200
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-15 13:05 +0200
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-07-15 16:28 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-16 01:13 +1000
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-07-15 18:27 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-15 12:20 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-15 12:44 +0200
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 16:26 -0700
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 16:17 +0100
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 16:35 -0700
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 10:57 +1000
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-07-14 01:59 +0100
              Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-13 07:46 -0400
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-07-13 16:04 +0300
              Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 23:00 +1000
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-07-13 16:16 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 23:49 +1000
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-07-13 17:23 +0300
                Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 00:28 +1000
          Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-07-11 14:54 -0400
          Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 13:27 -0600
          Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 14:06 -0600
          Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-11 16:34 -0400
          Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-07-11 16:52 -0400
          What is precision of a number representation? (was: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-12 06:56 +1000
            Re: What is precision of a number representation? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-11 23:28 +0100
          Re: What is precision of a number representation? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-07-11 14:22 -0700
          Re: What is precision of a number representation? (was: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 07:51 +1000
            Re: What is precision of a number representation? (was: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats) Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-07-12 00:14 +0100
              Re: What is precision of a number representation? (was: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 09:57 +1000
            Re: What is precision of a number representation? (was: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-12 14:19 +1000
              Re: What is precision of a number representation? (was: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 14:36 +1000
              Re: What is precision of a number representation? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-12 11:50 +0200
                Re: What is precision of a number representation? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-12 13:27 +0300
                Re: What is precision of a number representation? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-12 13:02 +0200
                Re: What is precision of a number representation? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-12 23:16 +1000
          Re: What is precision of a number representation? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-07-11 15:17 -0700
            Re: What is precision of a number representation? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-12 16:21 +1000
              Re: What is precision of a number representation? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-12 09:36 -0400
          Re: What is precision of a number representation? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-07-11 15:29 -0700
          Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-12 11:26 +1200
          Re: What is precision of a number representation? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 11:57 +1000
          Re: What is precision of a number representation? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-12 13:41 +1000
          Re: What is precision of a number representation? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-07-12 00:14 -0400
          Re: What is precision of a number representation? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2016-07-12 00:17 -0400

csiph-web