Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #32346

Re: Negative array indicies and slice()

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <andrewr3mail@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:209.85.223': 0.03; 'elements.': 0.05; 'initialize': 0.05; 'chunk': 0.07; 'defines': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; '*end*': 0.09; 'array.': 0.09; 'behavior,': 0.09; 'indexes': 0.09; 'integers': 0.09; 'pointers': 0.09; 'subject:()': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'programmer': 0.11; 'index': 0.13; 'do,': 0.15; "'c'": 0.16; "'c',": 0.16; '10:00': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'iterator,': 0.16; 'know;': 0.16; 'level;': 0.16; 'merely': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'ranges.': 0.16; 'routinely': 0.16; 'subject:array': 0.16; 'thought.': 0.16; 'twice.': 0.16; 'xrange': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'integer': 0.17; 'issue,': 0.17; 'pointer': 0.17; 'written,': 0.17; 'memory': 0.18; 'variable': 0.20; 'equivalent': 0.20; 'skip:= 20': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'elements': 0.23; 'script': 0.24; 'pass': 0.25; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'skip:[ 10': 0.26; 'values': 0.26; 'question': 0.27; 'andrew': 0.27; 'important.': 0.27; 'replace': 0.27; 'actual': 0.28; 'arrays': 0.29; 'equivalent.': 0.29; 'fast.': 0.29; 'writes:': 0.29; 'array': 0.29; 'skip:_ 10': 0.29; 'class': 0.29; 'classes': 0.30; 'expect': 0.31; 'lists': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'could': 0.32; 'anyone': 0.33; 'know.': 0.33; 'likely': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'clear': 0.35; 'so,': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'created': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'alone': 0.36; 'data.': 0.36; 'thank': 0.36; 'itself': 0.37; 'october': 0.37; 'does': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'passed': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'far': 0.37; 'data': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'positive': 0.38; 'nothing': 0.38; 'possible.': 0.38; 'where': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'stand': 0.61; 'maximum': 0.63; 'skip:n 10': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'show': 0.63; 'fact,': 0.69; 'notice:': 0.71; 'contrary': 0.71; 'obvious': 0.71; 'ranges': 0.71; 'actually,': 0.84; 'flexible,': 0.84; 'ian,': 0.84; 'you;': 0.84
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <mailman.2991.1351484760.27098.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=207.55.87.38; posting-account=PPUdCwoAAABL5SHTC0kNfTVCKKHjc2Wa
References <6998a955-7b34-4f4f-b8d6-62d1028f7561@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2986.1351482209.27098.python-list@python.org> <4c024364-84df-403b-8b9e-4a4c8f06121c@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2991.1351484760.27098.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client true
X-Google-IP 207.55.87.38
MIME-Version 1.0
Subject Re: Negative array indicies and slice()
From Andrew <andrewr3mail@gmail.com>
To comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Cc Python <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Message-ID <mailman.2996.1351497278.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 71
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1351497278 news.xs4all.nl 6952 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48410
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:32346

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:26:01 PM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:00 PM,  Andrew wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ian,
> 
> > Well, no it really isn't equivalent.
> 
> > Consider a programmer who writes:
> 
> > xrange(-4,3) *wants* [-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2]
> 
> >
> 
> > That is the "idea" of a range; for what reason would anyone *EVER* want -4 to +3 to be 6:3???
> 
> 
> 
> That is what ranges do, but your question was about slices, not ranges.

Actually, I said in the OP:

"I also don't understand why slice() is not equivalent to an iterator, but can replace an integer in __getitem__() whereas xrange() can't."

=========================

Thank you for the code snippet; I don't think it likely that existing programs depend on nor use a negative index and a positive index expecting to take a small chunk in the center... hence, I would return the whole array; Or if someone said [-len(listX) : len(listX)+1 ] I would return the whole array twice.
That's the maximum that is possible.
If someone could show me a normal/reasonable script which *would* expect the other behavior, I'd like to know; compatibility is important.

=========================

My intended inferences about the iterator vs. slice question was perhaps not obvious to you; Notice: an iterator is not *allowed* in __getitem__().

The slice class when passed to __getitem__()  was created to merely pass two numbers and a stride to __getitem__;  As far as I know slice() itself does *nothing* in the actual processing of the elements.  So, it's *redundant* functionality, and far worse, it's restrictive.

The philosophy of Python is to have exactly one way to do something when possible; so, why create a stand alone class that does nothing an existing class could already do, and do it better ?

A simple list of three values would be just as efficient as slice()!
xrange is more flexible, and can be just as efficient.

So, Have I misunderstood the operation of slice()?  I think I might have... but I don't know.

In 'C', where Python is written, circularly linked lists -- and arrays are both very efficient ways of accessing data.  Arrays can, in fact, have negative indexes -- perhaps contrary to what you thought.  One merely defines a variable to act as the base pointer to the array and initialize it to the *end* of the array. Nor is the size of the data elements an issue, since in Python all classes are accessed by pointers which are of uniform size. I routinely do this in C.

Consider, also, that xrange() does not actually create a list -- but merely an iterator generating integers which is exactly what __getitem__ works on.
So, xrange() does not need to incur a memory or noticeable time penalty.

>From micro-python, it's clear that their implementation of xrange() is at the 'C' level; which is extremely fast.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-28 20:12 -0700
  Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 21:42 -0600
    Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-28 21:00 -0700
      Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 22:25 -0600
        Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew <andrewr3mail@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 00:54 -0700
          Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-10-29 01:18 -0700
          Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-29 11:19 +0000
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 22:32 +1100
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-28 21:52 -0700
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 23:40 +1100
              Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-29 22:02 +0000
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-28 23:01 -0700
              Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-10-29 09:52 -0400
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 08:20 -0700
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 17:01 -0600
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 00:04 +0000
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 16:54 -0700
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 02:15 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 00:53 +1100
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 11:09 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-29 22:14 +0000
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 08:42 -0700
              Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-30 00:02 +0000
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 12:34 -0700
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-30 08:17 +0000
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-30 08:47 -0700
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-30 23:48 +0000
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 23:29 -0600
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 23:53 -0600
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 17:04 -0700
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 09:55 +1100
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 17:07 -0600
              Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-10-29 19:24 -0400
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 17:43 -0600
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-10-29 20:17 -0400
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 18:05 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 11:00 -0700
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2012-10-29 18:49 -0700
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 15:39 -0700
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 23:55 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 00:51 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 17:17 -0700
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 01:21 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 01:32 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 02:46 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 12:02 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-30 07:21 -0700
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-30 21:33 +0000
              Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-31 10:07 +0000
                Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-31 16:01 +0000
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 15:47 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 15:55 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-31 09:00 +1100
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 16:02 -0600
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-30 23:30 +0000
          Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 11:27 -0600
          Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew Robinson <andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> - 2012-10-29 16:33 -0700
        Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew <andrewr3mail@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 00:54 -0700
    Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-28 21:00 -0700
    Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew <andrewr3mail@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 21:09 -0700
      Re: Negative array indicies and slice() alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 21:44 -0700
        Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-29 01:24 -0700
          Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-10-29 01:37 -0700
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-29 01:59 -0700
              Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-29 09:36 +0000
              Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-29 10:34 +0000
            Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-29 01:59 -0700
      Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-28 22:14 -0700
        Re: Negative array indicies and slice() andrewr3mail@gmail.com - 2012-10-29 01:08 -0700
          Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-10-29 01:26 -0700
    Re: Negative array indicies and slice() Andrew <andrewr3mail@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 21:09 -0700
  Re: Negative array indicies and slice() MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-10-29 03:45 +0000
  Re: Negative array indicies and slice() 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-11-01 18:08 -0700

csiph-web