Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #16013
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <d@davea.name> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.005 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'interpreter': 0.05; 'desirable.': 0.07; 'decorator': 0.09; 'defined.': 0.09; 'function:': 0.09; 'incompatible': 0.09; 'question?': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'def': 0.13; 'betting': 0.16; 'executed,': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.104': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'code': 0.25; "i'm": 0.26; 'function': 0.27; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'usually': 0.31; 'change.': 0.32; 'changes': 0.32; "isn't": 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'possible,': 0.34; 'nested': 0.34; 'but': 0.37; 'received:192': 0.37; "it's": 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'your': 0.61; 'proved': 0.67; 'discovered': 0.68; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; '09:44': 0.84; 'andrea': 0.84 |
| Date | Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:06:00 -0500 |
| From | Dave Angel <d@davea.name> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: decorators and closures |
| References | <4ECA63D2.7080603@gmail.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <4ECA63D2.7080603@gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Provags-ID | V02:K0:ZqNWBjmq+geh9SRCcnmd1S9vMCqCk0o7FZnp+kFelLl wQKPCGIwgCjqYpAcbGzDGxRNMH6hj+yUuFS9OJaEjc4/WjxvQz f8QeC0/f7wGGwU1NSxyJPgp1qHq8P9/0CJ0cRUx2EbwPYhbXW1 QLnz8vEsH02QBArFrm5F+eoLRy87WVjeT7QlO9m8ustz/aQsq5 aH8Pj/zIh3D2VO5c7WkevqzQGkdY+nAPL0B1dyRiWK94PYgAYF ps8ymUtzrJ9yGgKZHzp3NqhVoHCeAQZz2crkJI6QhCtKWZtHUI iKHq89p2nzBnOU+HiovGyHJqntWAAcyoaCSJKgC/s5xmYFE/g= = |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| Reply-To | d@davea.name |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2904.1321887989.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 40 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1321887989 news.xs4all.nl 6948 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:43930 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16013 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 11/21/2011 09:44 AM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
> With one colleague I discovered that the decorator code is always
> executed, every time I call
> a nested function:
>
> def dec(fn):
> print("In decorator")
> def _dec():
> fn()
>
> return _dec
>
> def nested():
> @dec
> def fun():
> print("here")
>
> nested()
> nested()
>
> Will give:
> In decorator
> In decorator
>
> So we were wondering, would the interpreter be able to optimize this
> somehow?
> I was betting it's not possible, but I'm I would like to be wrong :)
Your function 'nested' isn't nested, 'fun' is. What you discovered is
that a decorator is always executed, every time a nested decorated
function is defined.
You've also ust proved that it would be an incompatible change. Doesn't
that answer the question? An optimizer that changes the behavior isn't
usually desirable.
--
DaveA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: decorators and closures Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2011-11-21 10:06 -0500
csiph-web