Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #47392
| From | Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Idiomatic Python for incrementing pairs |
| Date | 2013-06-08 13:29 -0400 |
| References | <20130607213239.3e39a448@bigbox.christie.dr> <BLU176-W41787828AF1636314057B8D79A0@phx.gbl> <20130607231622.31cb120b@bigbox.christie.dr> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2889.1370712552.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 6/8/2013 12:16 AM, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2013-06-08 07:04, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
>> alpha, beta = (1 if some_calculation(params) else 0, 1 if
>> other_calculation(params) else 0)
>
> This one sets them to absolute values, rather than the incrementing
> functionality in question:
>
>>> alpha += temp_a
>>> beta += temp_b
>
> The actual code in question does the initialization outside a loop:
>
> alphas_updated = betas_updated = 0
> for thing in bunch_of_things:
> a, b = process(thing)
> alphas_updated += a
> betas_updated += b
I am pretty sure that this is the faster way to get the result.
> and it just bugs me as being a little warty for having temp
> variables when Python does things like tuple-unpacking so elegantly.
So use it ;-).
> That said, as mentioned in a contemporaneous reply to Jason, I haven't
> found anything better that is still readable.
The generalization of what you want is a mutable vector with an in-place
augmented assignment version of element by element addition. That
probably has been written. Nnmpy arrays do vector addition and maybe do
it in-place also (I just do ot know). But here is a custom class for the
problem you presented.
def process(val):
return val, 2*val
class Pair(list):
def __init__(self, a, b):
self.append(a)
self.append(b)
def inc(self, a, b):
self[0] += a
self[1] += b
pair = Pair(0, 0)
for val in [1,2,3]:
pair.inc(*process(val))
print(pair)
>>>
[6, 12]
This is cleaner but a bit slower than your in-lined version. I did not
use __iadd__ and += because unpacking 'other' (here the process return)
in the call does the error checking ('exactly two values') for 'free'.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Idiomatic Python for incrementing pairs Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-06-08 13:29 -0400
csiph-web