Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #40490

Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <bsk16@case.edu>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'received:209.85.223': 0.03; 'interpreter': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'compiler': 0.05; 'that?': 0.05; 'interpreter.': 0.07; 'line:': 0.07; 'referring': 0.07; 'x86': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'compilers.': 0.09; 'referenced': 0.09; 'runtime': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'subject:create': 0.09; '"hello': 0.16; 'better?': 0.16; 'compilers': 0.16; 'literals,': 0.16; 'objects?': 0.16; 'runtime.': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'to:name:python list': 0.16; 'later': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'basically': 0.17; 'integer': 0.17; 'string,': 0.17; 'typing': 0.17; '(in': 0.18; 'email addr:gmail.com&gt;': 0.20; 'import': 0.21; 'thanks.': 0.21; 'constant': 0.22; 'defined': 0.22; '&gt;': 0.23; 'random': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'object,': 0.27; 'possible,': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'subject:like': 0.29; 'url:mailman': 0.29; 'convert': 0.29; 'skip:& 10': 0.29; 'figure': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; '(and': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'url:listinfo': 0.32; 'doubt': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; "can't": 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'skip:{ 10': 0.36; 'enough': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'object': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'help': 0.40; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'is.': 0.62; 'between': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'information': 0.63; 'believe': 0.69; 'soon': 0.70; 'lose': 0.71; '2013': 0.84; 'dict,': 0.84
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=RbZ8ejqgG6+f9I9nZZYSNn4gPzf71FVPTBkJVGvTdlw=; b=mE/wTegMU0l5pnuvgoPBOP/8u1dDK+QmDm6pelp5iiryc3a+teLq5RTPoXeofGgJVF gpqtQ+5zL5buI46P7RRNoZsyeZTmH4bdqY05/NlXwtepMmfUodyO3dEGa+E1suGEsMWa woCnOKkXiuAb3rJ1ZQmKkYTPGKMf7Cs+5LmyNYquwnXUljvlUxFmFImLAHuhIrM1zbVw Q1tfhZRjMISj2iDaBd/6mThf7FaVixXegwU3D4Ntu9wqA+mjXiftW0BU61cwQsZePARe RK/Oykiir4P1x4gH4f8IMxSNXRhvcWldOdoH/NgLty+mTkpWR1bhKovoyjArkn2ig+yU FouA==
X-Received by 10.60.3.71 with SMTP id a7mr17183399oea.35.1362443273010; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:27:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.60.3.71 with SMTP id a7mr17183396oea.35.1362443272867; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:27:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <b91a25e1-0d00-4b29-a229-47ad32d9feae@h17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
References <b428fdef-a577-45c0-b37c-60bde74e3ae1@googlegroups.com> <kh2iij$msn$1@reader1.panix.com> <b91a25e1-0d00-4b29-a229-47ad32d9feae@h17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
Date Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:27:52 -0800
Subject Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C?
From Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu>
To Python List <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f839d514e6ac504d7228b58
X-Gm-Message-State ALoCoQlQjY961S6nKC7/BGF4muXLXOliDEZDZ+3uuoEAkutI1B2II1dBXj8PkAi/Z+iT87LhWcw4uaBbBgDR0+YYBouF4JfVjNppGFc1hrNwDu9FUicRHK0PWgdMkClCyX8pDVbvokNOItXsS4Pp+hN17bzkR4HNNQ==
X-Junkmail-Whitelist YES (by domain whitelist at mpv1.tis.cwru.edu)
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2859.1362443657.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 117
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1362443657 news.xs4all.nl 6884 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36749
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:40490

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mar 4, 2013 3:02 PM, "CM" <cmpython@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > The main issue is that python has dynamic typing.  The type of object
> > that is referenced by a particular name can vary, and there's no way
> > (in general) to know at compile time what the type of object "foo" is.
> >
> > That makes generating object code to manipulate "foo" very difficult.
>
> Could you help me understand this better?  For example, if you
> have this line in the Python program:
>
> foo = 'some text'
> bar = {'apple':'fruit'}
>
> If the interpreter can determine at runtime that foo is a string
> and bar is a dict, why can't the compiler figure that out at
> compile time?  Or is the problem that if later in the program
> you have this line:
>
> foo = 12
>
> now foo is referring to an integer object, not a string, and
> compilers can't have two names referring to two different
> types of objects?  Something like that?
>
> I in no way doubt you that this is not possible, I just don't
> understand enough about how compiling works to yet "get"
> why dynamic typing is a problem for compilers.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

In the case of literals, the compiler can figure out type information (and
I believe it does do some constant folding). But as soon as you let
something else get in between you and the constant, you lose all guarantees.

import random

if random.random() <0.5 :
    spam = 3
else:
    spam = "hello world"

Then you get into monkey patching and dealing with types that may not be
defined at compile time. The only way a python compiler could convert that
to x86 assembly is if generated code that would look up the type
information at runtime. You'd basically be outputting a python interpreter.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? kramer65 <kramerh@gmail.com> - 2013-02-28 12:25 -0800
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Matty Sarro <msarro@gmail.com> - 2013-02-28 15:50 -0500
    Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-01 02:55 +0000
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-02-28 22:03 +0100
    Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-01 03:47 +0000
      Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-02-28 20:31 -0800
      Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-03-01 08:48 +0100
        Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-02 01:49 +0000
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-03-01 08:10 +1100
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-02-28 22:17 +0100
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-02-28 16:18 -0500
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Modulok <modulok@gmail.com> - 2013-02-28 14:19 -0700
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Jonas Geiregat <jonas@geiregat.org> - 2013-02-28 22:33 +0100
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-02-28 22:01 +0000
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-02-28 17:06 -0500
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-28 21:09 -0500
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-01 04:27 +0000
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-02-28 20:38 -0800
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-28 22:21 -0800
  Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-03-04 16:36 +0000
    Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2013-03-04 14:55 -0800
      Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-03-04 15:12 -0800
      Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-04 19:31 -0500
      Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-03-05 11:33 +1100
      Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2013-03-04 16:27 -0800
    Re: Why is it impossible to create a compiler than can compile Python to machinecode like C? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-03-05 01:35 +0000

csiph-web