Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #32124
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <mail@timgolden.me.uk> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.001 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'interpreter': 0.04; 'socket': 0.05; 'subject:Question': 0.07; 'url:node': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; '(instead': 0.09; 'indeed,': 0.09; 'scripts,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'sections': 0.13; '(the': 0.15; 'describing': 0.16; 'from:addr:timgolden.me.uk': 0.16; 'from:name:tim golden': 0.16; 'gilles': 0.16; 'message- id:@timgolden.me.uk': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86.74': 0.16; 'received:smtp.webfaction.com': 0.16; 'received:webfaction.com': 0.16; 'tcp': 0.16; 'titled': 0.16; 'tjg': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'tim': 0.18; 'not,': 0.21; 'runs': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'script': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'leave': 0.26; 'question': 0.27; 'run': 0.28; '+0100,': 0.29; 'cgi': 0.29; 'loop,': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'basic': 0.30; 'generally': 0.32; 'running': 0.32; 'choosing': 0.33; 'received:192.168.100': 0.33; 'likely': 0.33; "can't": 0.34; 'but': 0.36; 'loaded': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'uses': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'description': 0.39; 'instead': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'here:': 0.62; 'time,': 0.62; 'url:15': 0.65; 'url:6': 0.65; 'incoming': 0.69; 'from:addr:mail': 0.71; '(your': 0.84; 'actually,': 0.84; 'confusion.': 0.84; 'subject:long': 0.84; 'subject:running': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.93 |
| Date | Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:24:16 +0100 |
| From | Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| CC | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: Question about long-running web scripts |
| References | <nm8i889v1p5orgk4dkvtcurguk11lvm6r8@4ax.com> <mailman.2838.1351166605.27098.python-list@python.org> <skci88lm21ldghic8k4leo8n6tminmam5l@4ax.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <skci88lm21ldghic8k4leo8n6tminmam5l@4ax.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2840.1351171460.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 29 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1351171460 news.xs4all.nl 6986 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46947 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:32124 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 25/10/2012 13:40, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:03:14 +0100, Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> > wrote: >> (Your question is a little confused at the end. I'm choosing to >> understand: why can't we just run Python one-shot, like CGI? The likely >> alternative meaning is: why can't the incoming request be routed to an >> already-running Python program -- which is not, of course, what CGI >> generally does. Hence my confusion). > > Yes indeed. Sorry about the confusion. > > But actually, I didn't mean one-shot scripts, where the Python > interpreter + script must be loaded each time, but rather: If I leave > a Python running in an endless loop, why not just use either CGI or > some other basic way to call the script instead of FastCGI? In essence, you're describing FastCGI. A Python program (or, indeed, any program) which uses FastCGI runs continuously and waits for the incoming request on a TCP socket (instead of as a sys.stdin stream + env vars immediately after process startup). The key description is here: http://www.fastcgi.com/drupal/node/6?q=node/15 (The sections have no anchors; you're looking for the section titled "2. FastCGI Interface") TJG
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question about long-running web scripts Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-10-25 13:45 +0200
Re: Question about long-running web scripts Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2012-10-25 13:03 +0100
Re: Question about long-running web scripts Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-10-25 14:40 +0200
Re: Question about long-running web scripts Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2012-10-25 14:24 +0100
Re: Question about long-running web scripts Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-10-26 11:58 +0200
Re: Question about long-running web scripts Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2012-10-26 12:00 +0100
Re: Question about long-running web scripts Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-10-26 13:37 +0200
Re: Question about long-running web scripts David Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-10-25 08:53 -0400
Re: Question about long-running web scripts Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-10-26 11:56 +0200
csiph-web