Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #15903

Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!amsnews11.chello.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.005
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'attribute': 0.07; 'subject:when': 0.07; 'from:addr:python': 0.09; 'subject:report': 0.09; 'subject:error': 0.10; 'skip:" 40': 0.15; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'func(*args)': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'received:84.92': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122.60': 0.16; 'reply-to:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '(most': 0.21; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.23; 'traceback': 0.24; 'load': 0.26; 'tried': 0.28; 'thanks': 0.31; 'comment': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'received:84': 0.34; 'last):': 0.34; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.34; 'object': 0.35; 'skip:" 20': 0.35; 'file': 0.36; 'subject:skip:m 10': 0.36; 'using': 0.37; 'could': 0.38; 'subject:with': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'here': 0.65; 'family,': 0.67; 'header :Reply-To:1': 0.70; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.71; 'subject:always': 0.84
X-CM-Score 0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis v=2.0 cv=TvRkdUrh c=1 sm=1 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=9jsOeB20M3cA:10 a=hwpRdV9lTX4A:10 a=OUOv7kDek9cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=W4Z-z-s0epiN__DfKuwA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117
X-AUTH mrabarnett:2500
Date Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:55:33 +0000
From MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing
References <12715937.830.1321611809592.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqoo7> <mailman.2829.1321630394.27778.python-list@python.org> <14330307.286.1321631316567.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcm23>
In-Reply-To <14330307.286.1321631316567.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcm23>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
Reply-To python-list@python.org
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2835.1321635315.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 28
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1321635315 news.xs4all.nl 6871 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59733
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:15903

Show key headers only | View raw


On 18/11/2011 15:48, Junfeng Hu wrote:
> Thanks
> Yes, I had tried this before, so you could find that I comment the line
> sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
> Here is the results.
> D:\Python test>mythread2.py
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>    File "<string>", line 1, in<module>
>    File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\forking.py", line 347, in main
>      self = load(from_parent)
>    File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 1378, in load
>      return Unpickler(file).load()
>    File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 858, in load
>      dispatch[key](self)
>    File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 1133, in load_reduce
>      value = func(*args)
>    File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\reduction.py", line 167, in rebuild_sock
> et
>      _sock = fromfd(fd, family, type_, proto)
>    File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\reduction.py", line 156, in fromfd
>      s = socket.fromfd(fd, family, type_, proto)
> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'fromfd'

The documentation for socket.fromfd says:

     Availability: Unix.

You're using Microsoft Windows.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 02:23 -0800
  Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:20 -0800
  Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-19 02:33 +1100
    Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:48 -0800
    Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:48 -0800
      Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:51 -0800
      Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:51 -0800
        Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-19 03:04 +1100
          Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 08:11 -0800
          Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 08:11 -0800
            Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-19 03:16 +1100
      Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-11-18 16:55 +0000
        Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 18:45 -0800

csiph-web