Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #15894
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <hujunfeng@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.058 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.02; 'socket': 0.04; 'subject:when': 0.07; 'reply-to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'subject:report': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'subject:error': 0.10; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.15; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.23; 'cc:2**0': 0.25; 'script.': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'actually': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'subject:skip:m 10': 0.36; 'subject:with': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.70; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.71; 'reply-to:addr:googlegroups.com': 0.73; ',the': 0.84; 'received:209.85.216.184': 0.84; 'received:mail- qy0-f184.google.com': 0.84; 'subject:always': 0.84 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Date | Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:51:49 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <14330307.286.1321631316567.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcm23> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=63.149.188.15; posting-account=dE7OLgoAAADuzLCox6ztdlv7_lgcaiKF |
| References | <12715937.830.1321611809592.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqoo7> <mailman.2829.1321630394.27778.python-list@python.org> <14330307.286.1321631316567.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcm23> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Google-Web-Client | true |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Subject | Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing |
| From | Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> |
| To | comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| Reply-To | comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2831.1321631512.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 2 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1321631512 news.xs4all.nl 6935 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37570 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:15894 |
Show key headers only | View raw
And actually ,the socket hadn't been used in this script.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 02:23 -0800
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:20 -0800
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-19 02:33 +1100
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:48 -0800
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:48 -0800
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:51 -0800
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 07:51 -0800
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-19 03:04 +1100
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 08:11 -0800
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 08:11 -0800
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-19 03:16 +1100
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-11-18 16:55 +0000
Re: Why sock.bind is always report 10048 error when in a script with multiprocessing Junfeng Hu <hujunfeng@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 18:45 -0800
csiph-web