Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #15870
| References | <27955957.352.1321582691251.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prap37> <mailman.2818.1321590908.27778.python-list@python.org> <3758934.65.1321592843731.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prms22> <CAPTjJmr6YQ-vDrqfp6xpwdENVFL5Mhkb=AKLZOSau3RJDX5kJg@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-11-17 21:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? |
| From | Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2824.1321595391.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:07 PM, John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> wrote: >> One of my questions was: would there be any merit to having the Python "pass" token itself defined exactly as _pass() is defined above? > > No, there wouldn't. The Python 'pass' statement is a special statement > that indicates a lack of anything to execute; a dummy function call > isn't this. What I would kinda like to see, though, is function > versions of many things. Your basic operators exist in the 'operator' > module, but the syntax is rather clunky; for comparison, Pike has > beautifully simple (if a little cryptic) syntax: back-tick followed by > the operator itself, very similar to the way C++ does operator > overloading. > > In Python 2, back-tick has a special meaning. In Python 3, that > meaning is removed. Is the character now available for this > "function-version" syntax? Negative. I know this from personal experience. Things that will Not Change in Python 3000 (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3099/ ): "No more backticks." Cheers, Chris R.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-11-17 18:18 -0800
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-11-17 18:45 -0800
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-11-17 21:03 -0800
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-11-17 21:03 -0800
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 13:59 +1100
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-17 22:04 -0800
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? Dominic Binks <dbinks@codeaurora.org> - 2011-11-17 19:01 -0800
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-11-18 14:45 +1100
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-11-17 20:34 -0800
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-11-17 21:07 -0800
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 16:34 +1100
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-11-17 21:49 -0800
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-18 06:07 +0000
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? John Ladasky <ladasky@my-deja.com> - 2011-11-17 21:07 -0800
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-11-18 10:57 +0100
Re: What exactly is "pass"? What should it be? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-11-18 13:03 +0000
csiph-web