Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #8216
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.009 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; ':-)': 0.06; 'e.g.,': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'from:addr:python': 0.09; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'does,': 0.16; 'enough:': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'received:84.92': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122.60': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'reply-to:addr :python-list': 0.16; 'math': 0.16; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'code': 0.24; 'received:84': 0.25; 'exercise': 0.29; 'import': 0.29; 'instead': 0.29; 'subject:How': 0.30; 'implementing': 0.32; 'does': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; "isn't": 0.33; 'too': 0.33; 'rather': 0.34; 'chris': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'curious': 0.35; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.35; 'using': 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'quite': 0.36; 'subject:can': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'skip:9 10': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'doing': 0.39; 'finding': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:1 10': 0.63; 'limit': 0.65; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.72; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'prime': 0.73; 'generator,': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84; 'factors': 0.91; 'subject:\t': 0.93 |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered | true |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result | AvgHAJQKAk5UXebj/2dsb2JhbABUhEmTbo5Yd4h1rlWRH4Erg3iBCgSWT4so |
| Date | Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:33:46 +0100 |
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? |
| References | <f97b3159-318a-41e2-9f28-339fa4a81d79@k6g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <its0ar02sia@news2.newsguy.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <its0ar02sia@news2.newsguy.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| Reply-To | python-list@python.org |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.282.1308756829.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 42 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.94.164.166 |
| X-Trace | 1308756834 news.xs4all.nl 49048 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:50181 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8216 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 22/06/2011 06:58, Chris Torek wrote:
> Now that the exercise has been solved...
>
> Instead of "really short code to solve the problem", how about
> some "really long code"? :-)
>
> I was curious about implementing prime factorization as a generator,
> using a prime-number generator to come up with the factors, and
> doing memoization of the generated primes to produce a program that
> does what "factor" does, e.g.:
>
> $ factor 99999999999999999
> 99999999999999999: 3 3 2071723 5363222357
>
> The python code is rather too slow for this particular number (I
> gave up on it finding 5363222357) but works quite well on 600851475143,
> or even, e.g., 12186606004219:
>
> $ python factor.py 600851475143 12186606004219
> 600851475143: 71 839 1471 6857
> 12186606004219: 2071723 5882353
>
[snip]
This code isn't particularly efficient, but it's fast enough:
import math
n = 99999999999999999
limit = math.sqrt(n)
test = 2
factors = []
while test <= limit:
if n % test == 0:
factors.append(test)
n //= test
limit = math.sqrt(n)
else:
test += 1
factors.append(n)
print(factors)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 12:48 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 14:02 -0600
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen@-NOSPAM-xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-21 22:10 +0200
sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen@-NOSPAM-xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-21 22:22 +0200
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 14:09 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-21 23:39 +0200
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 15:41 -0600
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 14:48 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 23:33 +0200
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 17:05 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 18:21 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 19:09 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 20:02 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-22 19:46 +0200
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-06-22 03:10 +0100
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-06-21 23:02 -0400
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 20:41 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-06-21 16:19 -0400
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2011-06-22 23:21 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-06-21 21:26 +0100
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-21 19:30 -0400
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 17:00 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-22 00:18 -0400
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 22:32 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-22 18:46 -0400
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-06-21 20:07 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Chris Torek <nospam@torek.net> - 2011-06-22 05:58 +0000
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 23:23 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Slaunger <slaunger@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 02:52 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 01:16 -0600
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Anny Mous <b1540457@tyldd.com> - 2011-06-22 22:01 +1000
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 22:28 +1000
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 09:52 -0600
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-06-22 16:33 +0100
csiph-web