Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #32077
| Date | 2012-10-25 09:56 +1100 |
|---|---|
| From | Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> |
| Subject | Re: while expression feature proposal |
| References | <CAPTjJmpnjKM_vk0HMCdQC6M0TPRbkWR87nLk3UNS7q9A4hNAeQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2804.1351119385.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 25Oct2012 09:40, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
| On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote:
| > If I could write this as:
| >
| > if re_FUNKYPATTERN.match(test_string) as m:
| > do stuff with the results of the match, using "m"
|
| Then you'd be right there with C-like languages where assignment is an
| expression :)
|
| while (tok = strtok(blah,blah)) ... do something with tok ...
Well, yes, that's the core convenience of the suggested syntax.
But without the =/== accident opportunity.
But with another assignment that doesn't look like an asisgnment syntax.
Like I said, I'm -0.
--
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
Be smart, be safe, be paranoid.
- Ryan Cousineau, courier@compdyn.com DoD#863, KotRB, KotKWaWCRH
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: while expression feature proposal Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2012-10-25 09:56 +1100
csiph-web