Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #100671

Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random
Date Mon, 21 Dec 2015 07:51:33 -0600
Lines 37
Message-ID <mailman.28.1450705921.2237.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <56776b9d$0$1615$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAHzaPEPb5gU278h=fq=6S4h5pYv5p3vpU9AbMTRonrda0RYCmA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de 2+sqdY1KWfmtSrxdedc5kAVpuSfB0Xw8szWsmjoKpJug==
Return-Path <vincent@vincentdavis.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.004
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'url:pypi': 0.03; '21,': 0.07; 'subject:into': 0.09; 'count)': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:non': 0.16; 'subject:random': 0.16; 'subject:versus': 0.16; 'underscores,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '&gt;': 0.18; 'archive': 0.18; 'email addr:gmail.com&gt;': 0.18; '2015': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; '(or': 0.23; 'dec': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'example': 0.26; 'mostly': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'looks': 0.29; 'url:python': 0.33; 'gives': 0.35; 'skip:& 20': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'skip:9 10': 0.37; 'thought': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'google': 0.39; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'results': 0.66; 'results.': 0.67; '7:25': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84; 'baby': 0.95
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vincentdavis.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=sUrK0ndUe9lvlJsi8EK1vhpHs86L1NGtSyc8UZJarGw=; b=gaL7I80TbnaA+UhwbRFzJqbBrIbhCUz4psYiVgaanwyx2Iz0zQapG2mPAjDIYTozNw kKRHAeN1aJSn6RlYX2I2xKonllokrwLOWVKDdLJWLG3Wa/Wy1sK9IvIxw3OAukeWGckV 4MWOJQEqedSRofb5wfla/azfKQqX5+8f3sTFQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=sUrK0ndUe9lvlJsi8EK1vhpHs86L1NGtSyc8UZJarGw=; b=g0jP0HfQSi6YcsiPTOtYBx4yS3a2AfIWa66LxNLlea1h7+n8SIxYgnsUNNID4pTr0H +iQ8csiX2bMsseio1aX1NqaZ3H3+QlLSQXBVxS6naFzpRIBN0wYmsX//HZAkz9R/NhUA 7Nn5H9piO8iKatHLgUaYenvDqO2O/v6FZoWA0Inlm4i2L6a9hGrRyKFnNWFmeARX1hwU NMZ/N2Y2blL77HBPq+ghx73XIeBQTCaLIVq9xXcIrJbtIBYMCt6M2j0Rjpk2anNTCyl+ aAbKg8v2wbSPyjDoxDu26q4PvX70p+tot4RyVP48d30K8RKkNbKnXHzKqnAe7i/4z1nq a38g==
X-Gm-Message-State ALoCoQkBedlaPGWHGMfNSXvWXbvB2xnfXcg4kW5Kzpfw5IdwxA2phmZG+rj/8yrK11ubVXlu8YkmI864SOJe6fKUa8X0UyxTSPdyDYDzSs3wgc8BX7XfzDU=
X-Received by 10.60.174.130 with SMTP id bs2mr7859499oec.42.1450705912989; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 05:51:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <CAHzaPEPb5gU278h=fq=6S4h5pYv5p3vpU9AbMTRonrda0RYCmA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Content-Filtered-By Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20+
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:100671

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > baby lions at play
> > saturday_morning12
> > Fukushima
> > ImpossibleFork
> >
> >
> > (note that some use underscores, others spaces, and some CamelCase) while
> > others are completely meaningless (or mostly so):
> >
> >
> > xy39mGWbosjY
> > 9sjz7s8198ghwt
> > rz4sdko-28dbRW00u
>

My first thought it to search google for each wor
​d​
or phase and count
​(google gives a count) ​
the results. For example if you search for "xy39mGWbosjY" there is one
result as of now,
​which
 is an archive of this tread. If you search for any given word or even the
phrase
​, for example​
"baby lions at play
​
" you get a much larger set of results
​ ~500​
. I assue there are many was to search google with python, this looks like
one. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/google

Vincent Davis

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 14:01 +1100
  Categorising strings on meaningful–meaningless spectrum (was: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-12-21 14:45 +1100
    Re: Categorising strings on meaningful–meaningless spectrum (was: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 19:47 +1100
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 15:22 +1100
    Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 19:57 +1100
    Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 17:45 -0800
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-12-21 09:24 +0100
    Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-12-21 10:56 +0100
      Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-12-21 21:36 +1100
        Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-12-21 11:53 +0100
          Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-12-21 11:56 +0100
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 14:25 +0100
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net> - 2015-12-21 07:51 -0600
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-21 16:40 +0000
    Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 09:49 -0700
      Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random duncan smith <duncan@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-21 17:41 +0000
    Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-12-21 17:09 +0000
  Re: Catogorising strings into random versus non-random Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-12-21 09:20 -0800

csiph-web