Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #54225
| From | Michael Schwarz <michi.schwarz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Is %z broken for return values of time.gmtime()? |
| Date | 2013-09-16 15:15 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.28.1379337330.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
I’m wondering whether this is expected:
Python 3.3.2 (default, May 21 2013, 11:50:47)
[GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple Clang 4.1 ((tags/Apple/clang-421.11.66))] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import time
>>> time.strftime("%F %T %z", time.gmtime(40 * 365 * 86400))
'2009-12-22 00:00:00 +0100‘
According to the documentation of time.gmtime(), it returns a struct_time in UTC, but %z is replaced by +0100, which is the UTC offset of my OS’s time zone without DST, but DST is currently in effect here (but was not at the timestamp passed to gmtime()).
40 * 365 * 86400 seconds is a bit less than 40 Years. I’m using a date near to today to rule out any peculiarities with dates that are long in the past. Using a date at which DST was active yields the same result:
>>> time.strftime("%F %T %z", time.gmtime(40.5 * 365 * 86400))
'2010-06-22 12:00:00 +0100'
Why is my OS’s time zone used for formatting a struct_time with the UTC time zone? I’m running OS X 10.8.4, my OS’s time zone is set to CET/CEST.
Regards
Michael
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is %z broken for return values of time.gmtime()? Michael Schwarz <michi.schwarz@gmail.com> - 2013-09-16 15:15 +0200
csiph-web