Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26319
| References | <CAF_E5JY5FgEJub7tNNzZEj0tri8Z7oPZUSLOLtD+5f0t7Yv+Yg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF_E5JY2sEsauXM-teW4hTHePqFCYK6z+9oLMZcjVWFyYs+gKg@mail.gmail.com> <5017EFB0.6080608@shopzeus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-31 16:26 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Pass data to a subprocess |
| From | andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2788.1343748380.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
2012/7/31 Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>: >> I think I got it now, if I already just mix the start before another add, >> inside the Process.run it won't see the new data that has been added after >> the start. So this way is perfectly safe only until the process is launched, >> if it's running I need to use some multiprocess-aware data structure, is >> that correct? > > Yes. Read this: > > http://docs.python.org/library/multiprocessing.html#exchanging-objects-between-processes > > You can use Queues and Pipes. Actually, these are basic elements of the > multiprocessing module and they are well documented. I wonder if you read > the documentation at all, before posting questions here. > > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list As I wrote "I found many nice things (Pipe, Manager and so on), but actually even this seems to work:" yes I did read the documentation. I was just surprised that it worked better than I expected even without Pipes and Queues, but now I understand why.. Anyway now I would like to be able to detach subprocesses to avoid the nasty code reloading that I was talking about in another thread, but things get more tricky, because I can't use queues and pipes to communicate with a running process that it's noit my child, correct?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-07-31 16:26 +0100
csiph-web