Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #28551

Re: [web] Long-running process: FCGI? SCGI? WSGI?

From Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de>
Subject Re: [web] Long-running process: FCGI? SCGI? WSGI?
Date 2012-09-06 08:07 +0200
References <4ofe485b0m50fi2qa7sk8d01369g2lo5el@4ax.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.278.1346911680.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> writes:

> To write a long-running web application, I'd like to some feedback
> about which option to choose.
>
> Apparently, the choice boilds down to this:
> - FastCGI
> - SCGI
> - WSGI
>
> It seems like FCGI and SCGI are language-neutral, while WSGI is
> Python-specific.
>
> Besides that, how to make an informed choice about which option to
> choose?

Obviously, this depends on your environment. Some hosters, web servers,
applications may directly support one interface and not others.

If you control your whole environment, I would look for a newer
approach. I do not know "SCGI" but I know that "WSGI" is fairly recent.
This means that during its design, "FastCGI" was already known and
not deemed to be sufficient. Thus, you can expect more features
(more modularisation, in this case) in "WSGI".

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[web] Long-running process: FCGI? SCGI? WSGI? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-09-05 14:03 +0200
  Re: [web] Long-running process: FCGI? SCGI? WSGI? Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de> - 2012-09-06 08:07 +0200

csiph-web