Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #98690

Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM?

From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM?
Date 2015-11-12 05:15 -0500
Message-ID <mailman.264.1447323370.16136.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <n1vpl3$hrl$1@news2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> <mailman.251.1447292269.16136.python-list@python.org> <877flnu4kn.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <n21cb4$agq$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmrjujycyc5hbL7SY4D0H0r+bKnCxj_fY9--rg5k9wgn5A@mail.gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/12/2015 2:37 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> wrote:
>> My understanding of async is that it creates an event loop. In which case
>> the loop has no chance to run within a block of code that computes anything,
>> is that correct?
>
> This is correct. At its simplest, asynchronous code is an abstraction
> over the select() call,

True on Unix-derived systems, where 'select' includes the various 
derivatives.  It is also an abstraction over the Windows completion 
calls, which are quite different.  The latter is why one must generally 
use a different event loop on Windows.  The point is that asyncio 
provides an *abstraction* such that after choosing the event loop, the 
rest of one's code is os-agnostic.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Ulli Horlacher <framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> - 2015-11-11 16:16 +0000
  Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-11 18:30 +0200
    Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Ulli Horlacher <framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> - 2015-11-11 17:06 +0000
      Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-11 20:03 +0200
        Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Ulli Horlacher <framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> - 2015-11-11 22:42 +0000
      Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 19:42 -0500
  Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-11-11 20:37 -0500
    Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-12 08:14 +0200
      Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-11-12 07:43 +0100
        Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 18:37 +1100
        Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-11-12 05:15 -0500
        Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 22:38 +1100
        Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-11-12 09:01 -0500
      Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Ulli Horlacher <framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> - 2015-11-12 07:22 +0000
        Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-12 10:15 +0200
    Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Ulli Horlacher <framstag@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> - 2015-11-12 06:58 +0000
  Re: cross platform alternative for signal.SIGALRM? Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2015-11-12 16:20 +1100

csiph-web