Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #11917

Re: Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...]

Date 2011-08-20 10:50 -0400
From "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>
Subject Re: Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...]
References (2 earlier) <4e4ecae1$0$29990$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAHUGJcF3DrMKtC-D46Z82G8Q3CGimOm5-x_otsVb6T5Me4qUJA@mail.gmail.com> <1313796267.11691.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <CAO+9iGcz9u+X6FFk-CiPRz8tWcjOaU+3K8tUrS8Xzs9j0c9tsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF3XjbxVAQ28qVeT4DgTLKgr+bjkCYiYJdsCfiuGt3AYJ2JTxg@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.263.1313851840.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 08:17:32 -0400
David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I found said joke rather funny :P
>  Perhaps, as a retired amateur comedian, my standards are too high,

How does one retire from amateur status?  Do you suddenly start
charging for telling jokes?  :-)

> but I don't think adding a smilie to a stupid post suddenly turns it
> into a joke. Nevertheless, the quality of the attempt is not really
> the issue here. The would-be humorist did not need to quote the spam.

Well, exactly.  I don't think that anyone made any comment about the
quality of the joke when talking about the first posting.  The only
thing that people said was that he shouldn't have repeated the spam.
Everyone, including the original poster, who defended the post did so
on the grounds that it was funny.  That's certainly debatable but no
one was telling him not to post until he gets funnier.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Whether the post was funny or not is a judgment call.  No one is saying
not to post unfunny jokes because no one is the arbiter of what's
funny.  If you want to argue with the complainers, argue with their
actual complaint.  Tell us why it is OK to repeat spam with all the
spammy URLS intact

By the way, my joke above is hilarious.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Hot Girls are Looking for Sex Sajjad Ahmad <sajjad.ahmad009@gmail.com> - 2011-08-19 11:38 -0700
  Re: Hot Girls are Looking for Sex Matty Sarro <msarro@gmail.com> - 2011-08-19 16:17 -0400
    Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-08-20 06:43 +1000
      Re: Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...] Rodrick Brown <rodrick.brown@gmail.com> - 2011-08-19 17:10 -0400
      Re: Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...] "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> - 2011-08-19 17:35 -0400
      Re: Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...] Rodrick Brown <rodrick.brown@gmail.com> - 2011-08-19 17:10 -0400
      Re: Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...] "Albert W. Hopkins" <marduk@letterboxes.org> - 2011-08-19 19:24 -0400
      Re: Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...] Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2011-08-20 18:16 +1000
      Re: Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...] "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> - 2011-08-19 17:40 -0400
      Re: Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...] David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> - 2011-08-20 08:17 -0400
      Re: Stop quoting spam [was Re: Hot Girls ...] "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> - 2011-08-20 10:50 -0400
  Re: Hot Girls are Looking for Sex Philip Semanchuk <philip@semanchuk.com> - 2011-08-19 16:25 -0400
  Re: Hot Girls are Looking for Sex hackingKK <hackingkk@gmail.com> - 2011-08-20 15:16 +0530
  Really, stop repeating spam! (Was: Hot Girls...) "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> - 2011-08-20 10:57 -0400
  Re: Really, stop repeating spam! (Was: Hot Girls...) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-20 15:59 +0100

csiph-web