Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #15554

Re: all() is slow?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'ascii': 0.07; 'attribute': 0.07; 'bug.': 0.07; 'received:verizon.net': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; 'will,': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'dict': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'tuple': 0.09; 'tuple.': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; '11/10/2011': 0.16; '3:51': 0.16; 'objects).': 0.16; 'py3': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:() ': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'jan': 0.19; "doesn't": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.23; 'function': 0.27; 'fact': 0.27; 'bit': 0.28; 'unicode': 0.28; 'members.': 0.30; '(e.g.': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'quite': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'someone': 0.33; 'instead': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.33; 'setting': 0.34; 'try:': 0.34; 'object': 0.35; 'another': 0.36; 'plans': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'expensive': 0.38; 'should': 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'supports': 0.40; 'more': 0.60; 'accepts': 0.64; 'specialized': 0.72; 'virtually': 0.73
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: all() is slow?
Date Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:25:40 -0500
References <Xns9F9684761E3AOKB@88.198.244.100> <436fb6a3-1075-45a6-8f93-5612d050b11a@q35g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmqESQc2HrMNSKLbnG5C8fvrOQvaPme0vTN9VS9eQkndFg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2558.1320799508.27778.python-list@python.org> <4eb9e9c2$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2577.1320879720.27778.python-list@python.org> <4ebb08b6$0$29970$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2580.1320888461.27778.python-list@python.org> <4ebb81e1$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CABicbJ+0EW1gNyFzVuhFkydAvHxrZCco-+CNK2h9LbxXbU4e6A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host pool-74-109-121-73.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To <CABicbJ+0EW1gNyFzVuhFkydAvHxrZCco-+CNK2h9LbxXbU4e6A@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2612.1320953170.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 31
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1320953170 news.xs4all.nl 6946 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54057
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:15554

Show key headers only | View raw


On 11/10/2011 3:51 AM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:

>> Because Python doesn't allow "--" to be an attribute name, and so
>> namedtuple doesn't let you try:
>>
>> t = namedtuple("T", "foo -- bar")(1, 2, 3)
>> print(t.foo)
>> print(t.--)
>> print(t.bar)
>
> '--' is a valid attribute name on virtually any object that supports
> attribute setting (e.g. function objects).

ob.-- is not valid Python because '--' is not a name.

 > Of course, you need to use setattr() and getattr().

I consider the fact that CPython's setattr accepts non-name strings to 
be a bit of a bug. Or if you will, leniency for speed. (A unicode name 
check in Py3 would be much more expensive than an ascii name check in 
Py2.) I would consider it legitimate for another implementation to only 
accept names and to use a specialized name_dict for attribute dictionaries.

So I consider it quite legitimate for namedtuple to requires real names 
for the fields. The whole point is to allow ob.name access to tuple 
members. Someone who plans to use set/getattr with arbitrary strings 
should just use a dict instead of a tuple.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-07 21:00 +0000
  Re: all() is slow? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-11-07 13:39 -0800
  Re: all() is slow? david vierra <codewarrior0@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 13:46 -0800
    Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 09:06 +1100
      Re: all() is slow? Henrik Faber <hfaber@invalid.net> - 2011-11-08 13:09 +0100
        Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 23:14 +1100
        Re: all() is slow? John Posner <jjposner@optimum.net> - 2011-11-08 17:51 -0500
        Re: all() is slow? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-11-08 17:56 -0600
    Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 19:44 -0500
      Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-09 02:47 +0000
        Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 18:01 -0500
          Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-09 23:11 +0000
            Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 20:26 -0500
              Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:50 -0800
                Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 23:40 -0500
                Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 07:35 +0000
              Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 07:48 +0000
                Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 03:51 -0500
                Re: all() is slow? gene heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2011-11-10 08:20 -0500
                Re: all() is slow? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-11-10 14:25 -0500
            Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 20:35 -0500
            Re: all() is slow? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:10 -0700
            Re: all() is slow? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-11-10 10:43 -0800
            Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 15:37 -0500
              Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 23:07 +0000
                Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 23:35 -0500
                Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-12 01:18 +0000
                Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 01:28 -0500
                Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 18:50 -0800
                Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 23:48 -0500
              Re: all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-11 05:40 +0000
            Re: all() is slow? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 14:19 -0700
              Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 22:56 +0000
            Re: all() is slow? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-11-10 13:47 -0800
        Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 10:15 +1100
    Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 12:19 +1100
    Re: all() is slow? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-11-08 17:30 -0800
      Re: all() is slow? Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2011-11-09 16:41 +0100
        Re: all() is slow? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-11-09 09:07 -0800
  Re: all() is slow? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-11-09 14:16 -0800
    Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:52 -0800
    Re: all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-10 19:35 +0000
  Re: all() is slow? BOOK-AZ <amalguseynov@gmail.com> - 2011-11-15 08:02 -0800

csiph-web