Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #15553
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; '(although': 0.05; 'attribute': 0.07; 'exec': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'dynamically': 0.09; 'figuring': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'readable': 0.09; 'reason?': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.15; 'code).': 0.16; 'input.': 0.16; 'objects).': 0.16; 'received:72.11': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125.166': 0.16; 'subject:() ': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'reason,': 0.18; 'figure': 0.20; 'later': 0.21; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'primarily': 0.21; 'name?': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.23; 'cc:2**0': 0.25; 'code': 0.25; 'code.': 0.26; 'fine': 0.26; 'function': 0.27; 'somebody': 0.27; 'fine.': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'pattern': 0.30; '(e.g.': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'certainly': 0.32; 'does': 0.32; "can't": 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'on,': 0.33; 'setting': 0.34; 'approach.': 0.34; 'sense,': 0.34; 'things': 0.35; "what's": 0.35; 'object': 0.35; 'certain': 0.35; 'like,': 0.36; 'limitation': 0.36; 'issue': 0.37; 'think': 0.37; 'some': 0.38; "it's": 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'being': 0.40; 'supports': 0.40; 'really': 0.40; 'more': 0.60; 'results': 0.61; 'projects': 0.62; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.64; 'received:184': 0.67; 'virtually': 0.73; 'troubles': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.93 |
| Date | Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:43:32 -0800 |
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| User-Agent | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| CC | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: all() is slow? |
| References | <Xns9F9684761E3AOKB@88.198.244.100> <436fb6a3-1075-45a6-8f93-5612d050b11a@q35g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmqESQc2HrMNSKLbnG5C8fvrOQvaPme0vTN9VS9eQkndFg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2558.1320799508.27778.python-list@python.org> <4eb9e9c2$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2577.1320879720.27778.python-list@python.org> <4ebb08b6$0$29970$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CABicbJ+KkQ8Of4a84TM5nN+ZSh-TBioboLZ9VX1JNzw8G2bToQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <CABicbJ+KkQ8Of4a84TM5nN+ZSh-TBioboLZ9VX1JNzw8G2bToQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-AntiAbuse | This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report |
| X-AntiAbuse | Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com |
| X-AntiAbuse | Original Domain - python.org |
| X-AntiAbuse | Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] |
| X-AntiAbuse | Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us |
| X-BWhitelist | no |
| X-Source | |
| X-Source-Args | |
| X-Source-Dir | |
| X-Source-Sender | mail.admailinc.com ([192.168.10.136]) [72.11.125.166]:2132 |
| X-Source-Auth | ethan+stoneleaf.us |
| X-Email-Count | 2 |
| X-Source-Cap | dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2611.1320951665.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 38 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1320951665 news.xs4all.nl 6947 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37190 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:15553 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> Well. It reads fine in a certain sense, in that I can figure out
> what's going on (although I have some troubles figuring out why the
> heck certain things are in the code). The issue is that what's going
> on is otherworldly: this is not a Python pattern, this is not a normal
> approach. To me, that means it does not read fine.
Certainly it's a Python pattern -- it's what you do to dynamically
generate code.
> The use of exec also results in (seemingly) arbitrary constraints on
> the input. Like, why can't "--" be a name? Because exec? Is there some
> other reason?
'--' not being allowed for a name has *nothing* to do with exec, and
everything to do with `--` not being a valid Python identifier.
> '--' is a valid attribute name on virtually any object that supports
> attribute setting (e.g. function objects). Of course, you need to use
> setattr() and getattr(). Is this really the reason, or is it a
> limitation caused primarily by the usage of exec and the need to
> prevent code injection? If somebody added this feature later on, would
> this create a security vulnerability in certain projects that used
> namedtuple in certain ways?
So you think
somevar = getattr(my_named_tuple, '--')
is more readable than
somevar = my_named_tuple.spam
?
~Ethan~
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-07 21:00 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-11-07 13:39 -0800
Re: all() is slow? david vierra <codewarrior0@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 13:46 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 09:06 +1100
Re: all() is slow? Henrik Faber <hfaber@invalid.net> - 2011-11-08 13:09 +0100
Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 23:14 +1100
Re: all() is slow? John Posner <jjposner@optimum.net> - 2011-11-08 17:51 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-11-08 17:56 -0600
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 19:44 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-09 02:47 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 18:01 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-09 23:11 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 20:26 -0500
Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:50 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 23:40 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 07:35 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 07:48 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 03:51 -0500
Re: all() is slow? gene heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2011-11-10 08:20 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-11-10 14:25 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 20:35 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:10 -0700
Re: all() is slow? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-11-10 10:43 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 15:37 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 23:07 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 23:35 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-12 01:18 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 01:28 -0500
Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 18:50 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 23:48 -0500
Re: all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-11 05:40 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 14:19 -0700
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 22:56 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-11-10 13:47 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 10:15 +1100
Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 12:19 +1100
Re: all() is slow? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-11-08 17:30 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2011-11-09 16:41 +0100
Re: all() is slow? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-11-09 09:07 -0800
Re: all() is slow? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-11-09 14:16 -0800
Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:52 -0800
Re: all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-10 19:35 +0000
Re: all() is slow? BOOK-AZ <amalguseynov@gmail.com> - 2011-11-15 08:02 -0800
csiph-web