Re: append in IMAP4 from imaplib very slow

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.006
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.99; 'S': 0.00; 'default.': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'runtime': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'code?': 0.16; 'message-id:@dough.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'runtime.': 0.16; 'subject:slow': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'exists': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'code.': 0.20; 'issue.': 0.20; 'disabled': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'setting': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'perl': 0.29; 'selecting': 0.29; 'seconds': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'server': 0.35; 'so,': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'bad': 0.37; 'ok,': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'bring': 0.62; 'our': 0.65; 'mailbox': 0.67; 'response.': 0.67; 'difference.': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'seconds!': 0.84; 'warrants': 0.84; 'subject:very': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject	Re: append in IMAP4 from imaplib very slow
Date	Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:30:11 -0400
References	<5010314F.80001@abusix.com> <5010B7B5.5040206@tim.thechases.com> <5010F689.8090701@abusix.com> <50110D14.7020906@abusix.com> <50113041.4010501@abusix.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	pool-173-75-251-66.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
In-Reply-To	<50113041.4010501@abusix.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2610.1343313046.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	24
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1343313046 news.xs4all.nl 6946 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55792
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:26091

Show key headers only | View raw

On 7/26/2012 7:55 AM, Simon Pirschel wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 11:25 AM, Simon Pirschel wrote:
>> Ok, forget about the EXISTS and RECENT response. The server will
>> response this way if you selected a mailbox, which I did in the Python
>> code but not in the Perl code. I disabled selecting the mailbox in
>> Python and there is no difference in the runtime. So, this isn't the
>> issue.
>
> I solved the issue. The bad performance is caused by the socketopt
> socket.TCP_NODELAY set to 0 by default.
>
> Request timing with socket.TCP_NODELAY=0: 0.0501310825348 seconds
> Request timing with socket.TCP_NODELAY=1: 0.0027711391449 seconds
>
> This is a huge difference. Setting TCP_NODELAY=1 will bring the runtime
> from 3:30 minutes down to 14 seconds! Not Perl speed, but close.

Do you think this warrants a change in our docs, if not the code?

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: append in IMAP4 from imaplib very slow Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-26 10:30 -0400

csiph-web