RE: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot

From	Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com>
Subject	RE: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot
Date	2013-06-03 17:49 +0300
References	<CAGGBd_o9+7MdUveT3AdQqQsUcL167GK_P886fdEiHqVjEhFBvg@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2597.1370270960.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

________________________________
> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 13:43:24 -0700 
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot 
> From: drsalists@gmail.com 
> To: carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com 
> CC: python-dev@python.org 
>  
>  
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno  
> <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com<mailto:carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com>>  
> wrote: 
> ---------------------------------------- 
> > Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 15:12:43 +1000 
> > From: koobs.freebsd@gmail.com<mailto:koobs.freebsd@gmail.com> 
> > To: python-dev@python.org<mailto:python-dev@python.org> 
> > Subject: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot 
> [...] 
> > koobs-freebsd10-amd64 (clang is default here) 
>  
>  
> Does CPython code compiled with clang runs faster than gcc? 
>  
> Why did you chose clang? Any benchmarks? Any benefits? 
>  
> Clang is sometimes favored over gcc for its non-GPL license; I believe  
> the FreeBSD project sees this as an important issue. 
>  
> In general, the more C compilers a piece of C code compiles on, the  
> fewer bugs are left in it, because different C compilers tend to catch  
> different problems - even with cranked up warnings. 
>

I've been to a Clang presentation and one of the important features they've shown were the improved error messages.

But I didn't try it yet.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

RE: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-06-03 17:49 +0300

csiph-web