Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #15520

Re: all() is slow?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <jeanpierreda@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.009
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; '(although': 0.05; 'exec': 0.07; 'hettinger': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; '(it': 0.09; 'bug,': 0.09; 'figuring': 0.09; 'reason?': 0.09; 'developer': 0.12; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.15; 'code).': 0.16; 'input.': 0.16; 'subject:() ': 0.16; 'to:addr:pearwood.info': 0.16; 'to:addr:steve+comp.lang.python': 0.16; "to:name:steven d'aprano": 0.16; 'wed,': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'otherwise,': 0.19; 'seems': 0.19; 'figure': 0.20; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'pointed': 0.21; 'raymond': 0.21; 'so.': 0.21; 'obviously': 0.23; 'fine,': 0.23; 'name?': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.23; 'cc:2**0': 0.25; 'saying': 0.25; 'fine': 0.26; "i'm": 0.26; 'somebody': 0.27; 'url:mailman': 0.27; 'fine.': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'senior': 0.29; 'module': 0.30; 'happen?': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'nov': 0.31; 'pm,': 0.31; 'actual': 0.32; 'url:listinfo': 0.32; 'does': 0.32; "can't": 0.32; 'it.': 0.33; 'someone': 0.33; 'there': 0.33; 'approach.': 0.34; 'sense,': 0.34; 'things': 0.35; "what's": 0.35; 'modules': 0.35; 'received:209.85.161': 0.35; 'certain': 0.35; 'url:python': 0.35; 'anything': 0.36; 'like,': 0.36; 'thread': 0.36; 'issue': 0.37; 'think': 0.37; 'steven': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'url:org': 0.38; "i'd": 0.39; "it's": 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'really': 0.40; 'more': 0.60; 'your': 0.61; 'results': 0.61; 'him,': 0.62; '2011': 0.62; 'full': 0.62; 'ever': 0.65; 'share': 0.66; 'respect': 0.66; 'doing.': 0.73; '-0500,': 0.84; 'cautious': 0.84; 'paranoia': 0.84; 'serious.': 0.84; 'troubles': 0.84; 'night,': 0.91; 'suspicious': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=CCoZfzgZF5rYeCG5O3i98pC8lNhYXMh0yhm5dsW7a+c=; b=fZwOhx1Zi3iXudK27lCiMokX6Y86oF0D0zoG2DhUwFc/EICmCGLZLKPjfZ+sbnuPGx 3EzmZLsr4OXwVmcQBpwXo8ENjoOviARwEWi740msksxomW37dt60+G0E2UOfQtRTu4w0 hSAZ2XOy7VcJLtc10tRS2jSazgrkRCGu+J6Sg=
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <4ebb08b6$0$29970$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References <Xns9F9684761E3AOKB@88.198.244.100> <436fb6a3-1075-45a6-8f93-5612d050b11a@q35g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmqESQc2HrMNSKLbnG5C8fvrOQvaPme0vTN9VS9eQkndFg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2558.1320799508.27778.python-list@python.org> <4eb9e9c2$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2577.1320879720.27778.python-list@python.org> <4ebb08b6$0$29970$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
From Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com>
Date Wed, 9 Nov 2011 20:26:56 -0500
Subject Re: all() is slow?
To "Steven D'Aprano" <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2580.1320888461.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 64
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1320888461 news.xs4all.nl 6860 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:43647
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:15520

Show key headers only | View raw


> Neither am I. I am less suspicious based on a reputation. Raymond is a
> well-known, trusted senior Python developer who knows what he is doing.

I don't really know anything about him or why people respect him, so I
have no reason to share your faith.

> It reads fine, and the justification is perfectly valid.

Well. It reads fine in a certain sense, in that I can figure out
what's going on (although I have some troubles figuring out why the
heck certain things are in the code). The issue is that what's going
on is otherworldly: this is not a Python pattern, this is not a normal
approach. To me, that means it does not read fine.

The use of exec also results in (seemingly) arbitrary constraints on
the input. Like, why can't "--" be a name? Because exec? Is there some
other reason?

I don't like the use of exec, and I don't like the justification (it
seems handwavy). I pointed this out in a thread full of people saying
"never EVER use exec this way", so it's obviously not just me that
thinks this is awful.

> You're right to be cautious of exec. You're wrong to be phobic about it.
> What do you think is going to happen?

I think somebody will read it and think this is a good idea.

Devin


On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:01:16 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>
>>> If it were someone other than Raymond Hettinger responsible for the use
>>> of exec in namedtuple, I'd be a lot more suspicious of it.
>>
>> I'm not going to be less suspicious based on a name.
>
> Neither am I. I am less suspicious based on a reputation. Raymond is a
> well-known, trusted senior Python developer who knows what he is doing.
>
>
>> It reads like
>> insanity, and the justification was terrible.
>
> It reads fine, and the justification is perfectly valid.
>
> You're right to be cautious of exec. You're wrong to be phobic about it.
> What do you think is going to happen? The exec call inside namedtuple is
> going to creep out of the module in the wee hours of the night,
> contaminating other functions and modules while you sleep? Be serious. If
> you have an actual concrete security vulnerability caused by the use of
> exec inside namedtuple, or some other bug, then say so. Otherwise, your
> paranoia is unjustified.
>
>
>
> --
> Steven
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-07 21:00 +0000
  Re: all() is slow? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-11-07 13:39 -0800
  Re: all() is slow? david vierra <codewarrior0@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 13:46 -0800
    Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 09:06 +1100
      Re: all() is slow? Henrik Faber <hfaber@invalid.net> - 2011-11-08 13:09 +0100
        Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 23:14 +1100
        Re: all() is slow? John Posner <jjposner@optimum.net> - 2011-11-08 17:51 -0500
        Re: all() is slow? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-11-08 17:56 -0600
    Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 19:44 -0500
      Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-09 02:47 +0000
        Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 18:01 -0500
          Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-09 23:11 +0000
            Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 20:26 -0500
              Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:50 -0800
                Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 23:40 -0500
                Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 07:35 +0000
              Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 07:48 +0000
                Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 03:51 -0500
                Re: all() is slow? gene heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2011-11-10 08:20 -0500
                Re: all() is slow? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-11-10 14:25 -0500
            Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 20:35 -0500
            Re: all() is slow? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:10 -0700
            Re: all() is slow? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-11-10 10:43 -0800
            Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 15:37 -0500
              Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 23:07 +0000
                Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 23:35 -0500
                Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-12 01:18 +0000
                Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 01:28 -0500
                Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 18:50 -0800
                Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 23:48 -0500
              Re: all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-11 05:40 +0000
            Re: all() is slow? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 14:19 -0700
              Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 22:56 +0000
            Re: all() is slow? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-11-10 13:47 -0800
        Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 10:15 +1100
    Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 12:19 +1100
    Re: all() is slow? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-11-08 17:30 -0800
      Re: all() is slow? Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2011-11-09 16:41 +0100
        Re: all() is slow? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-11-09 09:07 -0800
  Re: all() is slow? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-11-09 14:16 -0800
    Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:52 -0800
    Re: all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-10 19:35 +0000
  Re: all() is slow? BOOK-AZ <amalguseynov@gmail.com> - 2011-11-15 08:02 -0800

csiph-web