Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #8146
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | UNSURE 0.307 |
| X-Spam-Level | *** |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.41; '*S*': 0.02; 'check.': 0.07; 'division,': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:was': 0.16; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'seems': 0.21; 'received:209.85.220': 0.25; '(e.g.': 0.26; "i'm": 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'bound': 0.29; 'subject:How': 0.30; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'however,': 0.34; 'there': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'another': 0.37; 'page': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'could': 0.38; 'subject:can': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'smaller': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'subject: (': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'more': 0.60; 'kind': 0.60; 'subject:, ': 0.60; 'john': 0.62; 'subject:. ': 0.65; 'square': 0.67; 'discovered': 0.69; 'prime': 0.73; 'trial': 0.76; 'subject:over': 0.84; 'factors': 0.91; 'unclear': 0.91; 'subject:much': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=U0d17qj4/2SRQ6Ueoow8ZuP8+eQe5EJ1Yr8mW2qdgAU=; b=IwcFCqLNeVCBS6bhLHfoHo6VcdNksrtVE/dQjGtnDzsjeNfOegsanzVPd3kNfN4KG8 zWS+6W2fQFZbV98Gxwc4SuZMvZRQyJUW0zuhbsVByYg0dj9Y5NnPubZKSNm0F8HayxPx nIPq/DixDc/XyRlOd+LLGbAVP7rBM8f7O71SI= |
| DomainKey-Signature | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=q31T4z0mNoY7Ol83Xi9P311p6YpchUg+QLUB53F+vPeLxD2f34AiHRE+4nU/Y8cuQl Ui0ipfNiNVYp1zKAG/UhHV0z3JMJw29XjaxR/ipbXceRgsJuSMaJQebF7G+mqj5Sl/xh jAslo3Dy7vs0j3P2kZ+zu9jfwk22i98dzIB2M= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <8b8c4bc8-7b26-4113-b95b-7eccbbd0e901@q30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
| References | <f97b3159-318a-41e2-9f28-339fa4a81d79@k6g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <4e00faa9$0$49180$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <4e00fd85$0$49038$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <8b8c4bc8-7b26-4113-b95b-7eccbbd0e901@q30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
| Date | Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:33:33 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? |
| From | Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Mailman-Approved-At | Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:51:59 +0200 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.256.1308700322.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 14 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.94.164.166 |
| X-Trace | 1308700322 news.xs4all.nl 49047 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:49537 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8146 |
Show key headers only | View raw
2011/6/21 John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com>: > However, even after reading the Wikipedia page about prime numbers and > trial division, I'm still a little unclear as to why the square root > of the number is the upper bound of the range you need to check. > -- There are likely be some more elaborated proofs, but it seems sufficiently evident, that with the factors being the square root you get some kind of "middle position"; with other factors (e.g. two for simplicity), one of them could be greater, while the another has to be smaller; this smaller one would have been discovered already, while searching continuously until the square root of the given number. vbr
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 12:48 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 14:02 -0600
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen@-NOSPAM-xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-21 22:10 +0200
sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen@-NOSPAM-xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-21 22:22 +0200
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 14:09 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-21 23:39 +0200
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 15:41 -0600
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 14:48 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 23:33 +0200
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 17:05 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 18:21 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 19:09 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 20:02 -0700
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-22 19:46 +0200
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-06-22 03:10 +0100
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-06-21 23:02 -0400
Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 20:41 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-06-21 16:19 -0400
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2011-06-22 23:21 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-06-21 21:26 +0100
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-21 19:30 -0400
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 17:00 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-22 00:18 -0400
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 22:32 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-22 18:46 -0400
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-06-21 20:07 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Chris Torek <nospam@torek.net> - 2011-06-22 05:58 +0000
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 23:23 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Slaunger <slaunger@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 02:52 -0700
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 01:16 -0600
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Anny Mous <b1540457@tyldd.com> - 2011-06-22 22:01 +1000
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 22:28 +1000
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 09:52 -0600
Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-06-22 16:33 +0100
csiph-web