Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #15488
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.003 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'exec': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; '""")': 0.09; 'builtin': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'def': 0.14; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.15; 'mon,': 0.15; '5:06': 0.16; 'imho,': 0.16; 'received:209.85.210.42': 0.16; 'received:mail- pz0-f42.google.com': 0.16; 'stdlib.': 0.16; 'subject:() ': 0.16; 'tongue': 0.16; 'url:hg': 0.16; '\xc2\xa0if': 0.16; '\xc2\xa0you': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'slightly': 0.19; 'wrote': 0.19; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'maybe': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.23; 'cc:2**0': 0.25; 'code': 0.25; 'url:mailman': 0.27; 'import': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'invoke': 0.30; "it'd": 0.30; 'really,': 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; "didn't": 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'nov': 0.31; 'pm,': 0.31; 'tue,': 0.32; 'url:listinfo': 0.32; 'but,': 0.34; 'function.': 0.34; 'david': 0.34; 'url:python': 0.35; 'clearly': 0.36; 'fair': 0.36; 'but': 0.37; 'think': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'url:org': 0.38; "it's": 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'more': 0.60; '2011': 0.62; 'making': 0.67; 'specialized': 0.72; 'skip:\xc2 10': 0.73; 'url:lib': 0.84; 'stupid': 0.91 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y56aiXces+h2sBPB75/HAQvq7kfGHLtIelW1F6zLsXg=; b=f16YVNNof1vQ7DPJE5Ue8i2XNq4L/csfMkQLq8cJ/+uI4kbLyGDxxoFA2Rw/R6QcGg 2wPFYW9yuKXZ1a0p92vf+A+yXsqVfgoi7fn5hqect8y9GOA/nzgBNyXC1gZLbLQ6MsTt +mFWdb8SybAaCjHWOOOIsTw6ZafEPdZOsmo/U= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <CAPTjJmqESQc2HrMNSKLbnG5C8fvrOQvaPme0vTN9VS9eQkndFg@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <Xns9F9684761E3AOKB@88.198.244.100> <436fb6a3-1075-45a6-8f93-5612d050b11a@q35g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmqESQc2HrMNSKLbnG5C8fvrOQvaPme0vTN9VS9eQkndFg@mail.gmail.com> |
| From | Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> |
| Date | Tue, 8 Nov 2011 19:44:18 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: all() is slow? |
| To | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2558.1320799508.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 49 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1320799508 news.xs4all.nl 6891 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35110 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:15488 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Clearly what we need is a modern hygienic macro system to avoid this exec mess!
defmacro defall(name, cond):
def name(lst):
for a in lst:
if not cond:
return False
return True
invoke defall(all, cond)
Only slightly tongue in cheek.
We have that stupid exec trick in the Python stdlib. It has to die.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/6bf07db23445/Lib/collections/__init__.py#l240
Devin
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:46 AM, david vierra <codewarrior0@gmail.com> wrote:
>> But, you didn't write an all() function. You wrote a more specialized
>> allBoolean() function. I think this comparison is more fair to the
>> builtin all():
>
> So really, it's not "all() is slow" but "function calls are slow".
> Maybe it'd be worthwhile making an all-factory:
>
> def my_all(code,lst):
> exec("""def tmp_all(x):
> for a in x:
> if not ("""+code+"""): return False
> return True
> """)
> return tmp_all(lst)
> timeit.timeit('my_all("a in (True, False)",x)','from __main__ import
> my_all,x',number=10)
>
> Bad code imho, but it _is_ faster than both the original and the builtin.
>
> ChrisA
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-07 21:00 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-11-07 13:39 -0800
Re: all() is slow? david vierra <codewarrior0@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 13:46 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 09:06 +1100
Re: all() is slow? Henrik Faber <hfaber@invalid.net> - 2011-11-08 13:09 +0100
Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 23:14 +1100
Re: all() is slow? John Posner <jjposner@optimum.net> - 2011-11-08 17:51 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-11-08 17:56 -0600
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 19:44 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-09 02:47 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 18:01 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-09 23:11 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 20:26 -0500
Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:50 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 23:40 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 07:35 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 07:48 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 03:51 -0500
Re: all() is slow? gene heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2011-11-10 08:20 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-11-10 14:25 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 20:35 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:10 -0700
Re: all() is slow? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-11-10 10:43 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 15:37 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 23:07 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 23:35 -0500
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-12 01:18 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 01:28 -0500
Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 18:50 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2011-11-13 23:48 -0500
Re: all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-11 05:40 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 14:19 -0700
Re: all() is slow? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-11-10 22:56 +0000
Re: all() is slow? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-11-10 13:47 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-10 10:15 +1100
Re: all() is slow? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 12:19 +1100
Re: all() is slow? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-11-08 17:30 -0800
Re: all() is slow? Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2011-11-09 16:41 +0100
Re: all() is slow? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-11-09 09:07 -0800
Re: all() is slow? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-11-09 14:16 -0800
Re: all() is slow? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 19:52 -0800
Re: all() is slow? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-11-10 19:35 +0000
Re: all() is slow? BOOK-AZ <amalguseynov@gmail.com> - 2011-11-15 08:02 -0800
csiph-web