Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #39975
| References | <CAF_E5JasO841FBst9EtXJJEQkK54UELgBcAZk8GVyGHigxu8TQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidkatUmAyR06VwdqBr1MH=AbeNhxwzMufkREo3SRa_AbLg@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-26 17:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: groupby behaviour |
| From | andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2557.1361898573.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
2013/2/26 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:27 AM, andrea crotti > <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> wrote: >> So I was trying to use groupby (which I used in the past), but I >> noticed a very strange thing if using list on >> the result: > > As stated in the docs: > > """ > The returned group is itself an iterator that shares the underlying > iterable with groupby(). Because the source is shared, when the > groupby() object is advanced, the previous group is no longer visible. > So, if that data is needed later, it should be stored as a list: > """ > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list I should have read more carefully sorry, I was in the funny situation where it would have actually worked in the production code but it was failing in the unit tests (because I was using list only there). It's very weird though this sharing and still doesn't really look rightl, is it done just for performance reasons?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: groupby behaviour andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-26 17:09 +0000 Re: groupby behaviour Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-02-26 09:35 -0800
csiph-web