Re: GIL in alternative implementations

References	<7d244fb0-5457-4070-8569-306797f70131@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <4DEE6504.50906@stoneleaf.us> <BANLkTi=Q6pJLYjB1Af+SmntHOSbHUpb0gg@mail.gmail.com>
From	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date	2011-06-07 14:23 -0600
Subject	Re: GIL in alternative implementations
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2546.1307478259.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
> from functools import partial
>
> def g(value):
>    print(value)
>    return partial(g, value+1)
>
> f = partial(0)
> for i in range(10000):
>    f = f()

The "partial(0)" should read "partial(g, 0)", of course.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: GIL in alternative implementations Carl Banks <pavlovevidence@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 10:08 -0700
  Re: GIL in alternative implementations Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-06-07 10:51 -0700
  Re: GIL in alternative implementations Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 14:22 -0600
  Re: GIL in alternative implementations Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 14:23 -0600

csiph-web