Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #20998
| Date | 2012-02-28 09:58 -0800 |
|---|---|
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| Subject | Re: Question about circular imports |
| References | <jid2a9$n21$1@dough.gmane.org> <jid424$vfp$1@dough.gmane.org> <jieaid$e4k$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.189.1330323422.3037.python-list@python.org> <XnsA006CA54C1864OKB@88.198.244.100> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.254.1330455105.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
OKB (not okblacke) wrote: > Anyway, testing this just reinforced my distaste for circular > imports. Just trying to think about how it ought to work with a > importing c but then c and d importing each other makes my brain hurt. > Refactoring the files so that common code is in a separate library > imported by both is easier to understand, and has the nice side bonus > that it works. > +1 QOTW
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Question about circular imports "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2012-02-27 08:16 +0200
Re: Question about circular imports "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2012-02-28 03:55 +0000
Re: Question about circular imports Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-02-28 09:58 -0800
csiph-web