Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #90167
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Why is array.array('u') deprecated? |
| Date | 2015-05-08 15:11 +0200 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <80167ebf-c5ee-4699-89ca-ef544fe3decc@googlegroups.com> <554c8ff2$0$12990$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <93aaa9cd-5d30-44db-9324-4fffe292e9e4@googlegroups.com> <mailman.237.1431084939.12865.python-list@python.org> <7c33ef30-5923-49eb-933c-bfb568cb4753@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.249.1431090704.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
jonathan.slenders@gmail.com wrote:
>> Can you expand a bit on how array("u") helps here? Are the matches in the
>> gigabyte range?
>
> I have a string of unicode characters, e.g.:
>
> data = array.array('u', u'x' * 1000000000)
>
> Then I need to change some data in the middle of this string, for
> instance:
>
> data[500000] = 'y'
>
> Then I want to use re to search in this text:
>
> re.search('y', data)
>
> This has to be fast. I really don't want to split and concatenate strings.
> Re should be able to process it and the expressions can be much more
> complex than this. (I think it should be anything that implements the
> buffer protocol).
>
> So, this works perfectly fine and fast. But it scares me that it's
> deprecated and Python 4 will not support it anymore.
Hm, this doesn't even work with Python 3:
>>> data = array.array("u", u"x"*1000)
>>> data[100] = "y"
>>> re.search("y", data)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3.4/re.py", line 166, in search
return _compile(pattern, flags).search(string)
TypeError: can't use a string pattern on a bytes-like object
You can search for bytes
>>> re.search(b"y", data)
<_sre.SRE_Match object; span=(400, 401), match=b'y'>
>>> data[101] = "z"
>>> re.search(b"y", data)
<_sre.SRE_Match object; span=(400, 401), match=b'y'>
>>> re.search(b"yz", data)
>>> re.search(b"y\0\0\0z", data)
<_sre.SRE_Match object; span=(400, 405), match=b'y\x00\x00\x00z'>
but if that is good enough you can use a bytearray in the first place.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why is array.array('u') deprecated? jonathan.slenders@gmail.com - 2015-05-08 02:14 -0700
Re: Why is array.array('u') deprecated? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-05-08 02:37 -0700
Re: Why is array.array('u') deprecated? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-08 20:29 +1000
Re: Why is array.array('u') deprecated? jonathan.slenders@gmail.com - 2015-05-08 04:05 -0700
Re: Why is array.array('u') deprecated? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-08 13:35 +0200
Re: Why is array.array('u') deprecated? jonathan.slenders@gmail.com - 2015-05-08 05:12 -0700
Re: Why is array.array('u') deprecated? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-08 15:11 +0200
Re: Why is array.array('u') deprecated? jonathan.slenders@gmail.com - 2015-05-08 07:40 -0700
Re: Why is array.array('u') deprecated? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-11 08:03 +0100
csiph-web