Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #31664

Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness

References <CANaSqUfLX7V2OxhO+fdVtmQcDzNfEgQfutHak_G-9_1_4nNr1Q@mail.gmail.com> <50802B5B.6040902@cs.wisc.edu>
Date 2012-10-19 03:26 +1100
Subject Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2453.1350577573.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
>    Python isn't as bad as C++ though (my main other language), where
>    80 characters can go by *very* quickly.
>
> 2. Backslash continuations are *terrible*. I hate them with a firery
>    passion. :-) A line could be 1000 characters long and it would be
>    better than a 120-character line backslash-continued.

I have one mid-sized C++ project at work that's pretty much
exclusively under my control. There is precisely ONE place where
backslash continuations crop up, and that's long strings that want to
be formatted on multiple lines (eg huge SQL statements) - in Python,
they'd be trip-quoted. We don't have *any* backslash continuations in
Python code.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 03:26 +1100

csiph-web