Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #25827
| Date | 2012-07-22 20:27 +0300 |
|---|---|
| From | Jan Riechers <janpeterr@freenet.de> |
| Subject | Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? |
| References | <3rCdnUCiWpP1gZHNnZ2dnUVZ7vQAAAAA@giganews.com> <e9VOr.124006$PE.28478@fx04.am4> <mailman.2430.1342974153.4697.python-list@python.org> <500c31d7$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2436.1342978199.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 22.07.2012 20:01, Steven D'Aprano wrote: [SNIP] > map is faster than an ordinary for-loop if the function you are applying > is a builtin like int, str, etc. But if you have to write your own pure- > Python function, the overhead of calling a function negates the advantage > of map, which is no faster than a for-loop. For example: > > results = map(int, sequence) # calls builtin `int` > > hoists the call to int into the fast C layer, instead of the slow Python > layer, and should be faster than > > results = [] > for x in sequence: > results.append(int(x)) > > which runs at the speed of Python. But: > > results = map(lambda x: x+1, sequence) # calls pure Python function > > if no faster than a for-loop: > > results = [] > for x in sequence: > results.append(x+1) > > Note: this has*nothing* to do with the use of lambda. Writing the "+1" > function above using def instead of lambda would give the same results. [SNAP] Hi Steven, besides that I testdrive Pypy (and still am impressed, other topic) - your answer was what I was picking for ;) Especially this part of you: > map is faster than an ordinary for-loop if the function you are applying > is a builtin like int, str, etc. [underlaying c-layer] But if you have to write your own pure- > Python function, the overhead of calling a function negates the advantage > of map [...] I did not know that the speed gain is up foremost present when using built-ins, but that's for sure something to keep in mind when writing code. Thanks for your explanation, clarifies a lot! Jan
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Tony the Tiger <tony@tiger.invalid> - 2012-07-22 10:29 -0500
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-07-22 11:39 -0400
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Tony the Tiger <tony@tiger.invalid> - 2012-07-22 11:01 -0500
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-07-22 18:30 +0200
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-07-22 15:39 +0000
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Tony the Tiger <tony@tiger.invalid> - 2012-07-22 11:01 -0500
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Jan Riechers <janpeterr@freenet.de> - 2012-07-22 19:20 +0300
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-22 17:01 +0000
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Jan Riechers <janpeterr@freenet.de> - 2012-07-22 20:27 +0300
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-07-23 14:27 +0000
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 08:31 -0700
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> - 2012-07-22 13:03 -0400
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Jan Riechers <janpeterr@freenet.de> - 2012-07-22 20:10 +0300
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-07-22 11:16 -0600
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-22 10:03 -0700
Re: Converting a list of strings into a list of integers? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-07-22 21:03 -0400
csiph-web