Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31641
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-18 07:07 -0700 |
| References | <2f12fa83-54cc-4fc2-85e4-b8aebebf4242@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2425.1350560975.27098.python-list@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: use of exec() |
| From | lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2434.1350569254.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 1:49:35 PM UTC+2, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:41 PM, lars van gemerden
>
> <lars@rational-it.com> wrote:
>
> > NameError: name 'function' is not defined
>
> >
>
> > which seems an odd error, but i think some global variable is necessary for this to work (if i put in globals() instead of {}, it works).
>
>
>
> The def statement simply adds a name to the current namespace. This
>
> should work (untested):
>
>
>
> class _functioncode(code):
>
> def _creat_func_(self):
>
> ns={}
>
> exec("def function(%s):\n\t%s" % (", ".join(type(self).args),
>
> "\n\t".join(self.split('\n'))),ns,ns)
>
> return ns.function
>
>
>
> But it's going to be eternally plagued by security issues. You may
>
> want, instead, to look at literal_eval from the ast module; but that
>
> won't work if you need anything other than, as the name suggests,
>
> literals.
>
>
>
> ChrisA
Thanks, Chris,
That works like a charm (after replacig "return ns.function" with "return ns['function']" ;-) ).
About the security, i noticed you can still import and use modules within the exec'ed code. Is there a way to prevent this or otherwise make this approach more secure.
I should say that the users that will be able to make custom functions, are not end-users, but authenticated designers, however i would like to close a backdoor to the whole framework.
Cheers, Lars
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
use of exec() lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-10-18 04:41 -0700
Re: use of exec() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 22:49 +1100
Re: use of exec() lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-10-18 07:07 -0700
Re: use of exec() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 01:29 +1100
Re: use of exec() lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-10-18 08:00 -0700
Re: use of exec() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 02:16 +1100
Re: use of exec() lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-10-19 16:43 -0700
Re: use of exec() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-20 13:00 +1100
Re: use of exec() lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-10-20 03:41 -0700
Re: use of exec() lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-10-20 03:41 -0700
Re: use of exec() lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-10-19 16:43 -0700
Re: use of exec() lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-10-18 08:00 -0700
Re: use of exec() lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-10-18 07:07 -0700
csiph-web