Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #8120

Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.85.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.007
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; "(i'm": 0.09; '21,': 0.09; 'through.': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.10; 'def': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.14; '1),': 0.16; '1:48': 0.16; 'answer,': 0.16; 'iterated': 0.16; 'n):': 0.16; 'shorten': 0.16; '\xa0for': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.17; 'tue,': 0.17; 'cheers,': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'cc:2**0': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.23; '\xa0if': 0.23; 'received:209.85.161.46': 0.23; 'received:mail- fx0-f46.google.com': 0.23; 'function': 0.25; 'received:209.85.161': 0.26; 'testing': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'far.': 0.29; 'subject:How': 0.30; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; "can't": 0.32; 'itself,': 0.35; 'quite': 0.36; 'optimization': 0.37; 'similar': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'could': 0.38; 'subject:can': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; '8bit%:6': 0.39; 'doing': 0.39; 'subject: (': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'initially': 0.39; 'john': 0.62; 'further': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'billion': 0.67; 'magnitude,': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N2gG8hE/HNP1b08fcGEmcgAv89+Ng9MSzKcHASilMmA=; b=CZDMS14sY9tXxIDY36JpUKyMpPp2EUY1i3yXwPsn6JMxIl+fFxjHhTqjaTJRkFH/kU K1L9kUeMeAYGb0vJ/+472O8haGxLgJSnBid8WOYA+DXcRtBpJRkd4KEFANa9xjKH3CbZ MZj6cbD17Hw7De1opBS+ZtZtvyRyCehkjLjpo=
DomainKey-Signature a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K5dxznv8btD6pjyj8e3bnf8CZqSx4ve7pI4bh8vP4hIQT3TN/KePza4tXjgIpWKvit fHg0cV/pAeIbjk2sVq0hDJRsd43xXtKCYsQsqL3epq5iwJFCbFEdqkw0a7MXyvOd9WYp TZhpL1/7ueFTWlFPOT46FQf8ziIE2cne5hGFc=
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <f97b3159-318a-41e2-9f28-339fa4a81d79@k6g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
References <f97b3159-318a-41e2-9f28-339fa4a81d79@k6g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:02:21 -0600
Subject Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)?
To John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.242.1308686573.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 27
NNTP-Posting-Host 82.94.164.166
X-Trace 1308686573 news.xs4all.nl 49179 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:35160
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8120

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:48 PM, John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is what I have so far. Initially the get_factors function just
> iterated over the entire range(2, n + 1), but since a number can't
> have a factor greater than half of itself, I tried to shorten the
> range by doing range(2, n //2), but that still leaves 300 billion
> numbers to go through.

Without giving you the answer, I will note that the range can be
further reduced by quite a lot (I'm talking orders of magnitude, not
just by half).

> def get_primes(number_list):
>    primes = number_list[:]
>
>    for n in number_list:
>        for x in range(2, n):
>            if n % x == 0:
>                primes.remove(n)
>                break
>
>    return primes

Also, primality testing and factorization are very similar problems,
and the same range optimization could be applied here as well.

Cheers,
Ian

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 12:48 -0700
  Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 14:02 -0600
  Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen@-NOSPAM-xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-21 22:10 +0200
    sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen@-NOSPAM-xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-21 22:22 +0200
      Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 14:09 -0700
        Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-21 23:39 +0200
        Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 15:41 -0600
          Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 14:48 -0700
        Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 23:33 +0200
        Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 17:05 -0700
          Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 18:21 -0700
            Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 19:09 -0700
              Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 20:02 -0700
                Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-22 19:46 +0200
            Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-06-22 03:10 +0100
            Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-06-21 23:02 -0400
              Re: sorry, possibly too much info. was: Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 20:41 -0700
  Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-06-21 16:19 -0400
    Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2011-06-22 23:21 -0700
  Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-06-21 21:26 +0100
  Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-21 19:30 -0400
    Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 17:00 -0700
      Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-22 00:18 -0400
        Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 22:32 -0700
          Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-22 18:46 -0400
  Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-06-21 20:07 -0700
  Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Chris Torek <nospam@torek.net> - 2011-06-22 05:58 +0000
    Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 23:23 -0700
      Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Slaunger <slaunger@gmail.com> - 2011-06-23 02:52 -0700
    Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 01:16 -0600
    Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Anny Mous <b1540457@tyldd.com> - 2011-06-22 22:01 +1000
      Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 22:28 +1000
      Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 09:52 -0600
    Re: How can I speed up a script that iterates over a large range (600 billion)? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-06-22 16:33 +0100

csiph-web