Re: [Python-ideas] iterable.unpack method

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'broken': 0.03; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'expressions': 0.07; 'works.': 0.07; 'subject:method': 0.09; 'sure,': 0.09; 'thread,': 0.09; 'violates': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; '(sorry': 0.16; 'ah,': 0.16; 'command,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'iterable': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'naming': 0.16; 'subject:ideas': 0.16; 'tuple,': 0.16; 'typo.': 0.16; 'mon,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'tim': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'subject:] ': 0.19; 'feb': 0.19; 'discussion': 0.20; 'import': 0.21; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.22; 'posted': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'looks': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'order.': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'chris': 0.28; 'chase': 0.29; 'concern': 0.29; 'concern.': 0.29; 'case,': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'evaluation': 0.30; 'url:python': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'wrong': 0.34; 'done': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'totally': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'url:docs': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'email name:python-list': 0.62; 'evaluate': 0.62; 'is.': 0.62; 'skip:n 10': 0.63; '2013': 0.84; 'dry': 0.84; 'url:reference': 0.84; 'sorry.': 0.91
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=W/LoV371N6Soosfv+ajCxUu1dsgSgL1LwzQb10vby0s=; b=nOSjpTLxdycBSvgkuCMJAQg7paco1S2aMpYmQn7gysWMg6bytaG+YqmQS/qShISZWv uZgIPzHy6vDxjDc4+hRBo52w4/mxq+0UDN9IelJ2Opmssu6TkLt+8GnRSJrJ1NrZWTGv C8W8r97H7U9QunqasP6NCiHt/eYK5WJq5aa4M+eYT4AAve1yePNTr2DSAI6wRo09kP18 a6UybKrZJ1ShCWo/BwyQYy/Twn3vWQeryPT8t7jpFrlUkzMrtmQB+Yuz8VLmg8rdLdkS 0X24IudzPpT2TfkpjB8FVMKDCzL+j0L+jZEqhPfmpBzBisFQoI/vgNhPJPxV+VVT3oO7 jdnw==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.52.22.194 with SMTP id g2mr7610427vdf.91.1361717605803; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 06:53:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To	<20130224084453.012d9e93@bigbox.christie.dr>
References	<c2d617bf-e2e1-40fe-b50b-7746aba06946@googlegroups.com> <kga1b9$apn$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmp==jidQSzK6yPXY2NY9Mi0QqpUuhTX3iy9MVaG5yAUrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADiSq7fgqhefNGDBQALEvTwh_8WvVKqgCWYgyrOwopMLXde0dA@mail.gmail.com> <kgboat$jhs$1@ger.gmane.org> <CADiSq7dyzeferPZoPj-MmMepa3bHqSA6m+7kgnin+-2pjZQv3g@mail.gmail.com> <CADiSq7dhcJggX96Nn_Q_YQHfQNO+fGZYGv2LCHpqAYGPjGBkgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7+vJJYH5Yb02HPjRbE5Vo14__XP4cPqOVUQ_ysO9bdS+pYyA@mail.gmail.com> <CADiSq7f=s49N9p+2haawW8Q5585+mKvXYv1NynYGgtKToOL41w@mail.gmail.com> <5129F8C4.4080307@hastings.org> <CAPTjJmq+imANaad7roL_Vfdn02qLVmYLgLkMfcPJbaNVfXtOKA@mail.gmail.com> <512A20A3.1020006@pearwood.info> <CAPTjJmoSwpQzq8WfH+LyNvjaYf81T0hc8nukJmjuC7WCe2qyQQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130224084453.012d9e93@bigbox.christie.dr>
Date	Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:53:25 +1100
Subject	Re: [Python-ideas] iterable.__unpack__ method
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To	python-list@python.org
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2407.1361717615.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	34
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1361717615 news.xs4all.nl 6872 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59524
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:39748

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Tim Chase
<python.list@tim.thechases.com> wrote:
> On 2013-02-25 01:19, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> >>>      command, subcommand = next(iterargs), next(iterargs)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Err.... is there a language guarantee of the order of evaluation
>> >> in a tuple, or is this just a "CPython happens to evaluate
>> >> independent expressions left-to-right"? This is totally broken
>> >> if the next() calls could be done in either order.
>> >
>> > It's a language guarantee.
>> >
>> > http://docs.python.org/2/reference/expressions.html#evaluation-order
>>
>> Ah, so it is. My bad, sorry! In that case, sure, this works. It
>> still violates DRY though, naming the iterable twice and relying on
>> the reader noticing that that means "take two off this one". But
>> that's a much weaker concern.
>
> Your DRY/readability concern might then be addressed by writing it as
>
>   from itertools import islice
>   # ...
>   command, subcommand = islice(iterargs, 2)
>
> (sorry if this was already addressed in the python-ideas@ thread,
> since I'm not subscribed there and it looks like discussion migrated
> to python-list@).

Blargh, it didn't migrate, I just posted to the wrong list courtesy of
a typo. Sorry.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [Python-ideas] iterable.__unpack__ method Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-25 01:53 +1100

csiph-web