Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #87739

Re: Root logger sanity

From Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Subject Re: Root logger sanity
Date 2015-03-19 11:33 +0100
Organization None
References <5277e05b-c333-4e25-80ba-bb9cd378ca84@googlegroups.com> <550AA066.8030909@rece.vub.ac.be>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.24.1426761236.10327.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Antoon Pardon wrote:

> On 03/19/2015 10:35 AM, martin.spamer@gmail.com wrote:
>> The following code is challenging my sanity, in my understanding of the
>> documentation this should pass, given that getLogger is supposed to
>> return the root logger and the root logger should be called 'root'.
> 
> Where do you get the idea that the root logger should be called 'root'?

>>> import logging
>>> logging.getLogger()
<logging.RootLogger object at 0x7fdef71a8630>
>>> _.name
'root'

The root logger is the only logger where

assert logger is logging.getLogger(logger.name)

fails. I can see that this may be a pitfall.

> AFAIU the documentation the root logger is nameless. So
> logging.getLogger() will return the root logger while
> logging.getLogger('root') will return the logger named 'root'
> 
> which are two different loggers.
> 
>>
>> https://docs.python.org/2/library/logging.html#logger-objects
>>
>> What am I missing?
>>
>>
>> from unittest import TestCase
>> import logging
>>
>> class LoggingSanityTest(TestCase):
>>
>>     def test_root_logging_sanity(self):
>>         assert logging.getLogger() == logging.getLogger('root')

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Root logger sanity martin.spamer@gmail.com - 2015-03-19 02:35 -0700
  Re: Root logger sanity Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2015-03-19 11:09 +0100
  Re: Root logger sanity Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-03-19 11:33 +0100

csiph-web