Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #46421
| References | <CAGVx7UWXAFHSHq37Ep-Vk=cM2wYrEGHSUhNc8s43bCvj_VcVow@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-29 17:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? |
| From | Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2388.1369873497.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ma Xiaojun <damage3025@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, list. > > For the core language, I have mixed feeling. On one hand, I find that > Python has some sweet feature that is quite useful. On the other hand, > I often find Pyhton snippets around hard to understand. I admit that I > never learned Python very formally; I've programmed in many other > languages already. > > Code snippets in BASIC or Pascal seems quite obvious to understand > (Unless I don't understand the algorithm) . > I'm finding it kind of hard to imagine not finding Python's syntax and semantics pretty graceful. About the only thing I don't like is: var = 1, That binds var to a tuple (singleton) value, instead of 1. Oh, and method decorators seem much more complex than they should've been. But on the whole, python is a pretty beautiful language. It's not just another rehash of Pascal though; if that's what you want you might be better off looking elsewhere.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-05-29 17:24 -0700 Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 16:15 -0700
csiph-web