Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #54565

Re: building an online judge to evaluate Python programs

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi Ned,

Could you please post here your AppArmor profile for restricted Python scripts?

Thanks,

Laszlo

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> wrote:
> On 9/20/13 6:26 PM, Jabba Laci wrote:
>>
>> I just found Docker ( http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/faq/ ). It seems
>> sandboxing could be done with this easily.
>
>
> At edX, I wrote CodeJail (https://github.com/edx/codejail) to use AppArmor
> to run Python securely.
>
> For grading Python programs, we use a unit-test like series of challenges.
> The student writes problems as functions (or classes), and we execute them
> with unit tests (not literally unittest, but a similar idea).  We also
> tokenize the code to check for simple things like, did you use a while loop
> when the requirement was to write a recursive function.  The grading code is
> not open-source, unfortunately, because it is part of the MIT courseware.
>
> --Ned.
>
>> Laszlo
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:08 PM, John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In <mailman.195.1379698177.18130.python-list@python.org> Jabba Laci
>>> <jabba.laci@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> There are several questions:
>>>> * What is someone sends an infinite loop? There should be a time limit.
>>>
>>> You could run the judge as a background process, and kill it after ten
>>> seconds if it hasn't finished.
>>>
>>>> * What is someone sends a malicious code? The script should be run in a
>>>> sandbox.
>>>
>>> You could run the judge from its own account that doesn't have access to
>>> anything else.  For extra security, make the judge program itself owned
>>> by
>>> a separate account (but readable/executable by the judge account.)
>>>
>>> I suppose you'd have to disable mail access from the judge account too.
>>> Not sure how to easily do that.
>>>
>>> --
>>> John Gordon                   A is for Amy, who fell down the stairs
>>> gordon@panix.com              B is for Basil, assaulted by bears
>>>                                  -- Edward Gorey, "The Gashlycrumb
>>> Tinies"
>>>
>>> --
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
>

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

building an online judge to evaluate Python programs Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 19:28 +0200
  Re: building an online judge to evaluate Python programs Aseem Bansal <asmbansal2@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 10:57 -0700
    Re: building an online judge to evaluate Python programs Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 20:30 +0200
      Re: building an online judge to evaluate Python programs John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2013-09-20 19:34 +0000
        Re: building an online judge to evaluate Python programs Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-09-22 12:53 -0400
  Re: building an online judge to evaluate Python programs John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2013-09-20 20:08 +0000
    Re: building an online judge to evaluate Python programs Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 00:26 +0200
    Re: building an online judge to evaluate Python programs Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-09-20 18:46 -0400
    Re: building an online judge to evaluate Python programs Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-09-21 16:29 -0400
    Re: building an online judge to evaluate Python programs Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 21:57 +0200

csiph-web