Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #25629

Re: reloading code and multiprocessing

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <dihedral88888@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'interpreter': 0.04; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'c/c++': 0.09; 'res': 0.09; 'spawn': 0.09; 'subject:skip:m 10': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'def': 0.10; 'c/c++,': 0.16; 'executable,': 0.16; 'executables': 0.16; 'func():': 0.16; 'reload': 0.16; 'setup(self):': 0.16; 'byte': 0.17; 'instance': 0.17; 'import': 0.21; 'runs': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'script': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'embedded': 0.27; 'dll': 0.27; 'run': 0.28; 'objects': 0.29; 'skip:& 10': 0.29; 'class': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; "skip:' 10": 0.30; 'function': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'running': 0.32; 'safely': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'skip:& 20': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'from:addr:googlemail.com': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'problems': 0.36; 'skip:p 20': 0.36; 'possible': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'received:209.85.216': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'files': 0.38; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'gives': 0.39; 'system.': 0.39; 'short': 0.39; 'easy': 0.60; 'remove': 0.61; 'different': 0.63; 'obtained': 0.71; 'andrea': 0.84; 'received:209.85.216.184': 0.84
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <mailman.2296.1342692914.4697.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=123.192.83.145; posting-account=5JdMBQoAAABHnS4mjpqEzxnmWtgiiVNw
References <mailman.2296.1342692914.4697.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client true
X-Google-IP 123.192.83.145
MIME-Version 1.0
Subject Re: reloading code and multiprocessing
From 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com>
To comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Cc python-list <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Message-ID <mailman.2304.1342710532.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 59
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1342710532 news.xs4all.nl 6912 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37109
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:25629

Show key headers only | View raw


andrea crotti於 2012年7月19日星期四UTC+8下午6時15分11秒寫道:
> We need to be able to reload code on a live system.  This live system
> has a daemon process always running but it runs many subprocesses with
> multiprocessing, and the subprocesses might have a short life...
> 
> Now I found a way to reload the code successfully, as you can see from
> this testcase:
> 
> 
> def func():
>     from . import a
>     print(a.ret())
> 
> 
> class TestMultiProc(unittest.TestCase):
>     def setUp(self):
>         open(path.join(cur_dir, &#39;a.py&#39;), &#39;w&#39;).write(old_a)
> 
>     def tearDown(self):
>         remove(path.join(cur_dir, &#39;a.py&#39;))
> 
>     def test_reloading(self):
>         &quot;&quot;&quot;Starting a new process gives a different result
>         &quot;&quot;&quot;
>         p1 = Process(target=func)
>         p2 = Process(target=func)
>         p1.start()
>         res = p1.join()
>         open(path.join(cur_dir, &#39;a.py&#39;), &#39;w&#39;).write(new_a)
>         remove(path.join(cur_dir, &#39;a.pyc&#39;))
> 
>         p2.start()
>         res = p2.join()
> 
> 
> As long as I import the code in the function and make sure to remove the
> &quot;pyc&quot; files everything seems to work..
> Are there any possible problems which I&#39;m not seeing in this approach or
> it&#39;s safe?
> 
> Any other better ways otherwise?

If a byte code interpreter is embedded in the executable, then the program 
can obtain or reload code objects in the run time.

In C/C++, unless one can swap some DLL safely or spawn in another process with 
new executables obtained from other places, or a script interpreter is embedded, otherwise it's not easy for an instance in C/C++ to get new methods dynamically.

or 

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

reloading code and multiprocessing andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-07-19 11:15 +0100
  Re: reloading code and multiprocessing 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-19 08:08 -0700
  Re: reloading code and multiprocessing 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-19 08:08 -0700

csiph-web